ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2025
Does a specific age group impact sperm cryobanking efficiency among adolescent and young adult cancer patients?
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFertility preservation is vital for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. Sperm cryobanking is a key option, but age-related factors influencing its efficiency remain unclear. This study evaluated the impact of age on cryobanking attempts, success rates, and disposition outcomes among AYA patients with cancer aged 11-25 years.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 298 AYA patients with cancer referred for fertility preservation counseling over 9 years. Data on cryobanking attempts, success rates, and disposition outcomes were stratified by age group (11-15, 16-20, and 21-25 years). Logistic regression was used to assess factors influencing these outcomes.
resultsThe mean age was 16.0 years, with leukemia (22.5%), sarcoma (22.1%), and lymphoma (17.1%) being the most common diagnoses. Among the cohort, 72.1% attempted cryobanking, with lower attempt rates in the youngest group (59.6%) compared to 82.2% and 88.2% in the older groups, respectively. Younger age was a significant predictor of not attempting cryobanking (adjusted odds ratio, 5.059; P=0.001); however, age did not affect the success of sperm cryobanking among patients who attempted it. Disposition analysis showed that 77.2% of samples remained in storage, while 16.2% were discarded; although disposal was often influenced by family decisions, no significant predictors of disposal were identified.
conclusionYounger patients are less likely to attempt sperm cryobanking, although success rates among those who do are comparable across age groups. While most patients continued storage, higher disposal rates in younger groups highlight the need for strategies to increase participation and support informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.