Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40499509›Full record

ReviewStem cell reports2025

Stem cell-based embryo models: The 2021 ISSCR stem cell guidelines revisited.

Amander T Clark, Heidi Cook-Andersen, Sarah Franklin, Rosario Isasi, Debra J H Mathews, Vincent Pasque, Peter J Rugg-Gunn, Patrick P L Tam, Hongmei Wang, Jan J Zylicz and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amander T ClarkDepartment of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, Center for Reproductive Science, Health and Education, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: clarka@ucla.edu.
Heidi Cook-AndersenDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Sarah FranklinUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rosario IsasiJohn P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Debra J H MathewsBerman Institute of Bioethics and Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Vincent PasqueKU Leuven-University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Institute for Single-Cell Omics (LISCO), Leuven, Belgium.
Peter J Rugg-GunnEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, CB22 3AT Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK; Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK.
Patrick P L TamChildren's Medical Research Institute and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hongmei WangKey State Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Jan J ZyliczNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Medicine - reNEW, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janet RossantThe Gairdner Foundation and the Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: janet.rossant@gairdner.org.

Funding

Differentiating embryonic stem cells into developing germ lineR01HD079546 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CLARK, AMANDER · 2015 to 2024
$3.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human stem cell-based embryo models (SCBEMs) are a research technology with the potential to facilitate our understanding of human embryogenesis, improve assisted reproductive technology outcomes, elucidate the causes of early pregnancy failure, and provide a clearer understanding of the developmental origins of disease. Given that human SCBEMs are designed to model specific phenotypic features and developmental processes of human embryos, they raise distinct concerns from other stem cell models, such as organoids. The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, published in 2021, made recommendations for research oversight of SCBEMs and established different categories of review based on involvement of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. However, recent progress has enabled unexpected ways to create increasingly complex models, as well as more efficient means of doing so without including all major extraembryonic lineages. A working group was tasked by the ISSCR executive to undertake a thorough reexamination of the guidelines in the light of these advances. The three main recommendations of the working group are that all research involving organized 3-dimensional human SCBEMs (1) should be subject to appropriate review, (2) must have a clear scientific rationale, and (3) must be subject to limited timelines. The proposed modifications to the ISSCR guidelines are intended to bring more clarity to the field, help guide the deliberations of researchers, oversight committees and other relevant stakeholders, and ensure continued public confidence.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianGuidelines as TopicModels, BiologicalStem Cell ResearchStem CellsEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansembryoISSCR guidelinesstem cell-based embryo models

Identifiers

PMID40499509
PMCPMC12181966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.