ReviewStem cell reports2025
Stem cell-based embryo models: The 2021 ISSCR stem cell guidelines revisited.
Review in Stem cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Enabled functional genomics in hPSCs-derived neural models for autism spectrum disorder.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- What counts as an embryo? : The regulatory status of stem cell-based embryo models in Asia.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- From Static to Dynamic: Fluorescence Imaging Technology Advances Precise Embryo Evaluation.Small methods · 2026Review
- Epigenetic blind spots - the role of DNA methylation dynamics in stem cell-based models of embryogenesis.FEBS letters · 2026Article
- Human stem cell-based embryo models: innovation, ethics, and policy.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Beyond integration: towards benchmarks for developmental potential in human stem cell-derived embryo models.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Morally relevant features warranting ethical oversight in human stem cell-based embryo models.Nature cell biology · 2026Review
- Back to the Future-A 50-Year Dive into Embryo Implantation Research: Cell Biological Paradox, Epithelial Cell Polarity, and EMT.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Stem Cell-Derived Embryo Models: Potential Platforms for Investigating Early Development and Embryotoxicity.International journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Dual-patterned pluripotent stem cells self-organize into a human embryo model with extended anterior-posterior patterning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Models of Implantation Using Human Stem Cells: Scientific Insights and Broader Considerations.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Dissecting Human Embryogenesis With Blastoids: Insights Into Lineage Specification and Early Development.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human stem cell-based embryo models (SCBEMs) are a research technology with the potential to facilitate our understanding of human embryogenesis, improve assisted reproductive technology outcomes, elucidate the causes of early pregnancy failure, and provide a clearer understanding of the developmental origins of disease. Given that human SCBEMs are designed to model specific phenotypic features and developmental processes of human embryos, they raise distinct concerns from other stem cell models, such as organoids. The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, published in 2021, made recommendations for research oversight of SCBEMs and established different categories of review based on involvement of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. However, recent progress has enabled unexpected ways to create increasingly complex models, as well as more efficient means of doing so without including all major extraembryonic lineages. A working group was tasked by the ISSCR executive to undertake a thorough reexamination of the guidelines in the light of these advances. The three main recommendations of the working group are that all research involving organized 3-dimensional human SCBEMs (1) should be subject to appropriate review, (2) must have a clear scientific rationale, and (3) must be subject to limited timelines. The proposed modifications to the ISSCR guidelines are intended to bring more clarity to the field, help guide the deliberations of researchers, oversight committees and other relevant stakeholders, and ensure continued public confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.