ArticleBiomaterials2026
Multi-omic spatially resolved analysis of the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode arrays.
Article in Biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial coated intracortical probes reduce invading microbe abundance and subsequent neuroinflammation.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated Cd14 siRNA delivery ameliorates the acute inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode implantation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of the physiological responses to injuries induced accompanying intracortical microelectrode implantation.Biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are devices implanted into the brain's cortex with the ability to record or stimulate neuronal activity. Unfortunately, MEAs tend to fail over chronic time points, limiting their clinical utility. Chronic failure has largely been attributed to the brain's neuroinflammatory response. Until recently, most of what was understood about the neuroinflammatory response to MEAs was learned through immunohistochemical analysis of small numbers of proteins. More recently, gene expression studies have sequenced thousands of mRNA molecules that contribute to neuroinflammation, but few studies have performed large-scale proteomic analyses. To expand the knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved, we have previously investigated the activity of 62 proteins within 180 μm of the MEA implant site using a spatial proteomic platform. In the present study, we are the first to apply large-scale genomics and proteomics to MEAs, as we evaluate changes in both the whole protein-encoding mouse transcriptome and our 62-protein proteomic panel. We further examine the spatial distribution of the neuroinflammatory response within three distinct domains adjacent to the MEA: 0-90 μm, 90-180 μm, and 180-270 μm from the implant site. Our analysis directly compares the gene and protein expression and highlights the need for segmentation based on proximal distance from the implant site. We also identify key pathways associated with immune cell activation, neurodegeneration, and metabolism that likely contribute to MEA failure and could be targeted to improve MEA performance in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.