ArticleCognition2025
Diffindo! Precise language comprehension in older adulthood revealed by event-related brain potential studies of domain knowledge.
Article in Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrophysiological evidence for age-related changes in event knowledge use during language comprehension.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
- Late Positive Potentials as an Index of "Desirably Difficult" Learning Processes Engaged During Language Comprehension: ERP Evidence From Studies of Domain Knowledge.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Regression analyses of event-related brain potentials dissociate general reading experience and domain-specific knowledge sources during language comprehension.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge accumulates across the lifespan, yet most research into its effects on language comprehension has focused on young adult college students. This leaves a critical gap in understanding how knowledge impacts comprehension in other populations, including healthy older adults. Older adults bring greater language experience and knowledge to comprehension tasks but also must contend with changes in cognitive factors like processing speed and working memory. We still know little about how older adults use their knowledge in real time and thus how basic comprehension abilities, which seem relatively stable across the adulthood, may arise from the use of different types of representations or processing mechanisms. To address this, we assessed levels of domain-specific knowledge (in this case, of the fictional world of Harry Potter; HP) and used event-related potentials to measure how that knowledge influenced language processing dynamics as older adults (ages 50-81 years) read HP-related sentences. For sentences ending with expected information (true HP "facts"), greater domain knowledge was associated with larger effects of contextual support on the N400, an ERP component linked to semantic access. However, older adults did not show domain knowledge-based N400 modulations to infelicitous but contextually related words, suggesting that they tended to maintain a narrower scope of semantic activation. By contrast, an analysis of trial-level back-sorted according to accuracy on a subsequent sentence-completion task revealed that when older adults could produce the correct sentence completion, domain knowledge did increase the tendency to activate broadly, possibly suggesting that high-knowledge individuals had engaged more actively in anticipatory processing. We suggest that comprehension mechanisms among older adults may capitalize on maturing semantic networks, which become functionally organized for more selective but accurate processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.