Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40499160›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Inhibiting and Promoting Factors for the Use of Video Consultations Among Individuals Covered by Statutory Health Insurance in German Outpatient Care: Cross-Sectional Study.

Lara Kleinschmidt, Jürgen Wasem, Udo Schneider, Anja Wadeck, Stephanie Sehlen, Sebastian Liersch, Katharina Schwarze, Franziska-Leonore Pankoke, Theresa Hüer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara KleinschmidtInstitute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5917-0995
Jürgen WasemInstitute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-168X
Udo SchneiderTechniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7079-4721
Anja WadeckTechniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8204-2038
Stephanie SehlenAOK Nordost, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9240-7047
Sebastian LierschAOK Nordost, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8613-4434
Katharina SchwarzeAOK NordWest, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-8673
Franziska-Leonore PankokeAOK NordWest, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2594-9797
Theresa HüerInstitute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7628-5707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideo consultations (VC) have proven to be a useful tool to enhance access to medical care for patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of VC has risen sharply. However, since (the end of) the pandemic, they have only been used to a limited extent by insured individuals in the German statutory health insurance (SHI).

objectiveThe aim of this survey is to identify inhibiting and promoting factors for the use of VC in the SHI-insured population.

methodsSurvey documents were distributed by 3 participating SHI funds to 33,816 insured individuals in 4 selected German federal states. Participation was anonymous and available in paper format or online via a QR code. Both descriptive methods as well as inferential statistics were performed for analysis. Subgroup analysis included evaluations based on gender, age groups, community size, chronic disease, and previous VC experience.

resultsThe response rate was 13.9%, resulting in 4600 included questionnaires from the 33,816 individuals approached. Although 75.3% (3132/4162) of the insured were interested in using VC in general, only 6.7% (302/4511) of them had used it at the time of the survey. Among respondents with little or no VC experience, 88.3% (2763/3129) stated that the lack of VC offered by physicians was the biggest obstacle to VC use. Other relevant inhibiting factors were concerns about the quality of medical care (1573/3589, 43.8%) and data protection (948/3861, 24.6%). A lack of technical equipment and a stable internet connection tended not to be an obstacle in the survey. Comparing subgroups, associations were identified in particular between the inhibiting factors and age groups as well as between the inhibiting factors and the presence of a chronic illness. With increasing age, participants were more likely to have data protection concerns (P<.001, Kendall Tau-c=0.128) or perceive VC as exhausting (P<.001, Kendall Tau-c=0.136). Similarly, participants with a chronic condition were more likely to perceive VC as stressful (chronic condition: 247/1177, 21% vs no chronic condition: 257/1847, 13.9%; χ²

conclusionsThe results suggest that insured individuals are interested in using VC but were rarely offered VC appointments. Therefore, it is important to reduce potential obstacles on the part of the service providers, who are currently limiting the availability of VC. Existing hurdles can best be addressed by targeting subgroup-specific hurdles as they tend to vary between subgroups.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCOVID-19Insurance, HealthTelemedicineVideoconferencingAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2descriptive methoddigital healthGermanGerman outpatient medical carehealth insurancehealth technologyinhibiting factorsmedical careoutpatientperspective of insured individualspromoting factorssubgroup analysissurveytelemedicineVCvideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID40499160
PMCPMC12198700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.