Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40499132›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Enhancing Pulmonary Disease Prediction Using Large Language Models With Feature Summarization and Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Multicenter Methodological Study Based on Radiology Report.

Ronghao Li, Shuai Mao, Congmin Zhu, Yingliang Yang, Chunting Tan, Li Li, Xiangdong Mu, Honglei Liu, Yuqing Yang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress of large language models in tumor diagnosis: applications in textual reports and medical imaging].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronghao Li *School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China, 86 010-83911542.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0987-9153
Shuai Mao *State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8078-986X
Congmin ZhuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China, 86 010-83911542.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-9128
Yingliang YangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China, 86 010-83911542.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3061-3652
Chunting TanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-3390
Li LiBeijing Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2926-8986
Xiangdong MuBeijing Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6410-2771
Honglei Liu *School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China, 86 010-83911542.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2963-5248
Yuqing Yang *State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-1346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid advancements in natural language processing, particularly the development of large language models (LLMs), have opened new avenues for managing complex clinical text data. However, the inherent complexity and specificity of medical texts present significant challenges for the practical application of prompt engineering in diagnostic tasks. Objective: This paper explores LLMs with new prompt engineering technology to enhance model interpretability and improve the prediction performance of pulmonary disease based on a traditional deep learning model. Methods: A retrospective dataset including 2965 chest CT radiology reports was constructed. The reports were from 4 cohorts, namely, healthy individuals and patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, lung cancer, and pneumonia. Then, a novel prompt engineering strategy that integrates feature summarization (F-Sum), chain of thought (CoT) reasoning, and a hybrid retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework was proposed. A feature summarization approach, leveraging term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and K-means clustering, was used to extract and distill key radiological findings related to 3 diseases. Simultaneously, the hybrid RAG framework combined dense and sparse vector representations to enhance LLMs' comprehension of disease-related text. In total, 3 state-of-the-art LLMs, GLM-4-Plus, GLM-4-air (Zhipu AI), and GPT-4o (OpenAI), were integrated with the prompt strategy to evaluate the efficiency in recognizing pneumonia, tuberculosis, and lung cancer. The traditional deep learning model, BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), was also compared to assess the superiority of LLMs. Finally, the proposed method was tested on an external validation dataset consisted of 343 chest computed tomography (CT) report from another hospital. Results: Compared with BERT-based prediction model and various other prompt engineering techniques, our method with GLM-4-Plus achieved the best performance on test dataset, attaining an F1-score of 0.89 and accuracy of 0.89. On the external validation dataset, F1-score (0.86) and accuracy (0.92) of the proposed method with GPT-4o were the highest. Compared to the popular strategy with manually selected typical samples (few-shot) and CoT designed by doctors (F1-score=0.83 and accuracy=0.83), the proposed method that summarized disease characteristics (F-Sum) based on LLM and automatically generated CoT performed better (F1-score=0.89 and accuracy=0.90). Although the BERT-based model got similar results on the test dataset (F1-score=0.85 and accuracy=0.88), its predictive performance significantly decreased on the external validation set (F1-score=0.48 and accuracy=0.78). Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to revolutionize pulmonary disease prediction, particularly in resource-constrained settings, by surpassing traditional models in both accuracy and flexibility. The proposed prompt engineering strategy not only improves predictive performance but also enhances the adaptability of LLMs in complex medical contexts, offering a promising tool for advancing disease diagnosis and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesNatural Language ProcessingDeep LearningHumansLarge Language ModelsLung NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedlarge language modelsLLMprompt engineeringpulmonary disease predictionRAGretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID40499132
PMCPMC12176309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.