Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40499040›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Recommendations for Successful Development and Implementation of Digital Health Technology Tools.

Rebecca Ting Jiin Loo, Francesco Nasta, Mirco Macchi, Anaïs Baudot, Frada Burstein, Riley Bove, Maike Greve, Holger Fröhlich, Sara Khalid, Arne Küderle and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rebecca Ting Jiin Loo *Biomedical Data Science Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 6 Avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg, 352 466644 ext 6186.ORCID 0000-0002-7566-1677
Francesco Nasta *Biomedical Data Science Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 6 Avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg, 352 466644 ext 6186.ORCID 0000-0001-6631-1205
Mirco Macchi *Biomedical Data Science Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 6 Avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg, 352 466644 ext 6186.ORCID 0009-0005-0901-5879
Anaïs BaudotMarseille Medical Genetics (MMG), INSERM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-7933
Frada BursteinDepartment of Human-Centered Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-0878
Riley BoveUCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-8800
Maike GreveDepartment of Digitalization, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-8285
Holger FröhlichDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5328-1243
Sara KhalidCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2845-5731
Arne KüderleDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Bayern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5686-281X
Susan L MooreDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-6066
Valerie StormsIndependent Patient Expert, PEP Matters, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9344-0248
John TorousDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-7937
Enrico GlaabBiomedical Data Science Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 6 Avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg, 352 466644 ext 6186.ORCID 0000-0003-3977-7469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Digital health technology tools (DHTTs) have the potential to transform health care delivery by enabling new forms of participatory and personalized care that fit into patients' daily lives. However, realizing this potential requires careful navigation of numerous challenges. This viewpoint presents the authors' experiences and perspectives on the development and implementation of DHTTs, addressing both established practices and controversial topics. This article offers a practical guide organized into 10 recommendations derived from a multidisciplinary lecture series and associated workshop discussions on "Digital Health and Digital Biomarkers" held at the University of Luxembourg in 2023-2024. Key messages include the need to understand specific health care challenges, form interdisciplinary teams, incorporate patient feedback, select appropriate measurement technologies, ensure data integration and interoperability, apply advanced data science techniques, use scalable designs and open standards, comply with regulatory requirements, and maintain continuous evaluation and improvement. While the guide highlights essential practices, it also addresses contentious issues such as balancing innovation with regulatory compliance, addressing ethical concerns in artificial intelligence adoption, managing privacy versus the need for comprehensive data integration and open science, and managing the financial sustainability of DHTTs. The authors argue that digital health's greatest potential lies in its ability to provide participatory and personalized care, but this requires a delicate balance between technological advances and ethical, legal, and social implications. Overall, this workshop-derived viewpoint aims to help health care professionals, engineers, developers, and researchers not only adopt best practices but also address and resolve the controversial aspects inherent in the development of DHTTs.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyDigital HealthHumansTelemedicineapplicationdata interoperabilitydata privacydigital healthelectronic health recordhealth care technologyhealth monitoringinterdisciplinary collaborationmobile healthreal-timerecommendationsregulatory compliancetechnologytelehealthuser-centered designuser engagementwearable

Identifiers

PMID40499040
PMCPMC12176242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.