ArticleJMIR aging2025
Sarcopenia and Risk of Cognitive Impairment: Cohort Study and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.
Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trajectory-Oriented Brain Vulnerability Framework for Cognitive Decline in Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Protein Consumption and Cognitive Health in Aging: Associations with Sarcopenia and Dietary Options, a Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- AI-driven predictive modeling of sarcopenia progression in limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy: a novel biomarker fusion approach.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Altered Neuromuscular Control and Beta-Band Cortical Compensation During Gait in Sarcopenia: An Exploratory Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Preserved muscle function as a protective factor against cognitive decline: Longitudinal results from the FINGER study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
- Sarcopenia in the Aging Process: Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Transitions in Sarcopenia Status and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Longitudinal Cohort Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over half the people over 60 years of age experience cognitive impairment, with limited treatment options, making it crucial to identify risk factors. Studies have examined the association between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment; however, the evidence is inconclusive and cannot be used to make causal inferences. Objective: This study aims to appraise the causal association of sarcopenia with cognitive impairment by triangulating the data from a cohort study and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Using UK Biobank data, we first examined the associations of sarcopenia and its indices (appendicular lean mass [ALM], handgrip strength, and gait speed) with cognitive function (fluid intelligence and prospective memory) by using mixed-effects regression models. Then, we explored the causal associations of genetically predicted sarcopenic indices with cognitive function through a 2-sample MR, and examined potential mediation by omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D levels, physical inactivity, falls, frailty, sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, stroke, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. Results: A total of 34,457 participants, with a mean age of 56.4 (SD 7.6) years, 51.1% (n=17,620) of which were female, completed baseline cognitive tests between 2006 and 2010 and attended at least 1 follow-up visit in 2012, 2014, or 2019, and were included in the observational analysis. The cohort study revealed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with cognitive impairment, which was evidenced by reduced fluid intelligence scores (β=-0.91, 95% CI -1.68 to -0.15; P=.02). Each of the sarcopenic indices also exhibited significant associations with either fluid intelligence or prospective memory (all P<.05). MR analyses yielded compelling evidence of positive associations between the genetically predicted increases in ALM (β=0.09, 95% CI 0.07-0.12; P<.001), handgrip strength (β=0.18, 95% CI 0.08-0.29; P<.001) and gait speed (β=0.78, 95% CI 0.53-0.29; P<.001) and improved cognitive function. The effects of ALM and handgrip strength on cognitive function were partially mediated by genetically predicted physical activity, with indirect effects of 0.01 (95% CI 0.00-0.02) for ALM and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.05) for handgrip strength. Conclusions: Our study suggests that sarcopenia is a potential causal risk factor for cognitive impairment, with physical activity acting as a modifiable mediator in this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.