ArticleBlood2025
Array genotyping of transfusion-relevant blood cell antigens in 6946 ancestrally diverse study participants.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction to Pharmacogenomics: Role of the Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory in Personalised Medicine-Current Status and Future Prospects.International journal of immunogenetics · 2026Review
- Fundamentals of big data and artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Improved red blood cell storage quality of blood from donors carrying the hypermorphic PIMT I120 variant.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Proof-of-principle: nanopore adaptive sampling enables full blood group genome analysis and resolution of hybrid alleles.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Assessing RBC transfusion efficacy in chronic transfusion recipients: advancing precision transfusion medicine.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBlood transfusions save millions of lives worldwide each year, yet formation of antibodies against nonself antigens remains a significant problem, particularly in patients who receive frequent transfusions. We designed and tested the Universal Blood Donor Typing (UBDT_PC1) array for automated high-throughput simultaneous typing of human erythrocyte antigens (HEAs), platelet antigens (HPAs), leukocyte antigens (HLAs), and neutrophil antigens to support selection of blood products matched beyond ABO/Rh. Typing samples from 6946 study participants of European, African, Admixed American, South Asian, and East Asian ancestry at 2 different laboratories showed a genotype reproducibility of ≥99% for 17 244 variants, translating to 99.98%, 99.90%, and 99.93% concordance across 338 372 HEA, 53 270 HPA, and 107 094 HLA genotypes, respectively. Compared with previous clinical typing data, concordance was 99.9% and 99.6% for 245 874 HEA and 3726 HPA comparisons, respectively. HLA types were 99.1% concordant with clinical typing across 8130 comparisons, with imputation accuracy higher in Europeans vs non-Europeans. Seven variant RHD alleles, a GYPB deletion underlying the U- phenotype, and 14 high-frequency antigen-negative types were also detected. Beyond blood typing, hereditary hemochromatosis-associated HFE variants were identified in 276 participants. We found that the UBDT_PC1 array can reliably type a wide range of blood cell antigens across diverse ancestries. Reproducibility and accuracy were retained when transfusion-relevant targets from the UBDT_PC1 array were incorporated into the UKBB_v2.2 genome-wide typing array. The results represent the potential for significant advancement toward improved patient care by reducing harm in transfusion recipients through extended matching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.