Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498862›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Balanced state of networks of winner-take-all units.

Rich Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rich PangPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2644-6110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irregularly timed action potentials, or spikes, are pervasively observed in the brain activity of awake mammals. However, the role of this temporal irregularity in neural computation is still not well understood. In canonical network models irregular spiking emerges via balanced, fluctuating input currents, leading to collective responses that track inputs linearly. How networks characterized by irregular spiking could support flexible nonlinear dynamics needed for general-purpose computation remains under ongoing debate. Here we characterize the dynamics of networks whose elementary unit is not a single neuron but a small group of neurons, with distinct tunings, that compete at each timestep via a winner-take-all (WTA) interaction. While WTA has long been proposed as an elementary functional motif in the brain and represents a powerful computational primitive, how large networks of such units behave has received less investigation. We show that these networks, like classic excitatory-inhibitory balanced networks, exhibit a chaotic fluctuation-driven regime characterized by sustained irregular activity resembling realistic cortical spiking, which we interpret as a multidimensional balance spread over several competing neural populations with different tunings. We develop a mean-field theory for the network, which shows how irregular spiking sustained by time-varying input fluctuations can support flexible nonlinear collective dynamics. Using the theory we predict and verify network regimes in which input fluctuations alone yield multistability, stable sequence generation, or complex heterogeneous firing rate dynamics-three core dynamical primitives thought to underlie memory-dependent neural computation-via consistent Poisson-like spiking produced through chaos. Thus, networks of WTA units support a chaotic fluctuation-driven regime characterized by irregular spiking that can power complex nonlinear collective dynamics. This represents a new model of brain activity capable of simultaneously reproducing realistic spike trains and diverse nonlinear firing rate patterns well posed for flexible computation, and which can be trained or fit to data.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNerve NetAnimalsBrainComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNeuronsNonlinear Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40498862
PMCPMC12157085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.