Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498807›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Semantic influences on object detection: Drift diffusion modeling provides insights regarding mechanism.

Jingming Xue, Robert C Wilson, Mary A Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingming XueSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0007-8501-9016
Robert C WilsonSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Mary A PetersonDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6988-7119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research shows that semantics, activated by words, impacts object detection. Skocypec & Peterson (2022) indexed object detection via correct reports of where figures lie in bipartite displays depicting familiar objects on one side of a border. They reported 2 studies with intermixed Valid and Invalid labels shown before test displays and a third, control, study. Valid labels denoted display objects. Invalid labels denoted unrelated objects in a different or the same superordinate-level category in studies 1 & 2, respectively. We used drift diffusion modeling (DDM) to elucidate the mechanisms of their results. DDM revealed that, following Valid labels, drift rate toward the correct decision increased, i.e., SNR increased. Invalid labels do not affect drift rate directly, but they create a context that diminishes the facilitative effect of valid labels on evidence accumulation. Threshold was higher in study 2 than control, but not in study 1. That more evidence must be accumulated from displays that follow labels denoting objects in the same-superordinate category as the object in the display indicates that more evidence from the display is needed to resolve semantic uncertainty regarding which object is present. These results support the view that semantic networks are engaged in object detection.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualSemanticsAdultComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40498807
PMCPMC12194206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.