Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498803›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Human Schistosoma exposure risk in rice fields and an exploration of fish species for snail and schistosomiasis biocontrol.

Alexandra Sack, Emily Selland, Sidy Bakhoum, Momy Seck, Nicolas Jouanard, Louis Dossou Magblenou, Jason R Rohr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra SackDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-5546
Emily SellandDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Sidy BakhoumDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Momy SeckStation d'Innovation Aquacole, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Nicolas JouanardStation d'Innovation Aquacole, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Louis Dossou MagblenouStation d'Innovation Aquacole, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Jason R RohrDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8285-4912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schistosomiasis is a devastating parasitic disease in which the infectious stage to humans is released by intermediate host snails. The Senegal River Basin (SRB) is a high-risk area for both urogenital and fecal human schistosomiasis and has extensive rice cultivation. However, occupational risk of schistosomiasis to people working in irrigated rice fields is not well established. We performed intermediate host snail surveys from 2022-2023 in rice fields and irrigation canals throughout the SRB. We discovered human schistosome-shedding snails in rice fields and adjacent irrigation canals during the rice growing and non-growing seasons, establishing a clear occupational exposure risk to rice farmers. Relative to the non-growing season, this risk was higher in the rice growing and harvest season when more people are in the rice fields. Rice-fish co-culturing might reduce this occupational risk to rice farmers if local fish species consume enough snail intermediate hosts to reduce Schistosoma transmission. Our predation trials revealed that local Heterotis niloticus and Hemichromis spp. fish consumed significant numbers of Biomphalaria pfeifferi and Bulinus spp. snails, and separate trials revealed that these same snail species exhibited only moderate avoidance and refuge use responses to fish chemical cues. These results indicate that there is exposure to Schistosoma parasites in rice fields in the SRB and introducing local fish to rice fields has promise for reducing this exposure as well as providing a protein source to rice farming families. We encourage future studies to more fully explore the benefits of rice-fish co-culturing in the West Africa.

Identifiers

PMID40498803
PMCPMC12157053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.