ArticlePloS one2025
Cataract induction in an arthropod reveals how lens crystallins contribute to the formation of biological glass.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contributions of aquatic organisms to understanding the vertebrate ocular lens.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Cataract induction in an arthropod reveals how lens crystallins contribute to the formation of biological glass.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lenses are vital components of well-functioning eyes and are crafted through the precise arrangement of proteins to achieve transparency and refractive ability. In addition to optical clarity for minimal scatter and absorption, proper placement of the lens within the eye is equally important for the formation of sharp, focused images on the retina. Maintaining these states is challenging due to dynamic and substantial post-embryonic eye and lens growth. Here, we gain insights into required processes through exploring the optical and visual consequences of silencing a key lens constituent in Thermonectus marmoratus sunburst diving beetle larvae. Using RNAi, we knocked down Lens3, a widely expressed cuticular lens protein during a period of substantial growth of their camera-type principal eyes. We show that lens3RNAi results in the formation of opacities reminiscent of vertebrate lens 'cataracts', causing the projection of blurry and degraded images. Consequences of this are exacerbated in low-light conditions, evidenced by impaired hunting behaviour in this visually guided predator. Notably, lens focal lengths remained unchanged, suggesting that power and overall structure are preserved despite the absence of this major component. Further, we did not detect significant shifts in the in-vivo refractive states of cataract-afflicted larvae. This in stark contrast with findings in vertebrates, in which form-deprivation or the attenuation of image contrast, results in the dysregulation of eye growth, causing refractive errors such as myopia. Our results provide insights into arthropod lens construction and align with previous findings which point towards visual input being inconsequential for maintaining correctly focused eyes in this group. Our findings highlight the utility of T. marmoratus as a tractable model system to probe the aetiology of lens cataracts and refractive errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.