Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498786›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The effects of luck perception on consumer variety-seeking.

Jianbin Zhao, Zheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianbin ZhaoSchool of Economics and Management, East China University of Technology, Jiangxi, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-8846-7497
Zheng LiCollege of Economy and Trade, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Agricultural Product Circulation Research Center, ZhongKai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Companies often use luck, which is thought to be a psychological force, as a marketing tool to perform marketing activities. This paper designed three experiments to verify the effects of luck perception on variety-seeking. Experiment 1 found that luck perception allows consumers to have more variety-seeking. Experiment 2 examined the mediating role of novelty-seeking motivation and found that luck perception improves the novelty-seeking motivation and makes consumers prefer variety-seeking. Experiment 3 examined the moderating role of need for cognitive closure. For consumers who have low need for cognitive closure, whether prime luck perception or not, their variety-seeking are not significantly different, while for consumers with high need for cognitive closure who are after luck perception primed, they have more variety-seeking. This study provides theoretical support for understanding luck scientifically and enlightens and guides companies to expand product lines, present new brands, and implement precision marketing.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorMarketingPerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40498786
PMCPMC12157096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.