ArticlePloS one2025
Tailored knowledge distillation with automated loss function learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge Distillation (KD) is one of the most effective and widely used methods for model compression of large models. It has achieved significant success with the meticulous development of distillation losses. However, most state-of-the-art KD losses are manually crafted and task-specific, raising questions about their contribution to distillation efficacy. This paper unveils Learnable Knowledge Distillation (LKD), a novel approach that autonomously learns adaptive, performance-driven distillation losses. LKD revolutionizes KD by employing a bi-level optimization strategy and an iterative optimization that differentiably learns distillation losses aligned with the students' validation loss. Building upon our proposed generic loss networks for logits and intermediate features, we derive a dynamic optimization strategy to adjust losses based on the student models' changing states for enhanced performance and adaptability. Additionally, for a more robust loss, we introduce a uniform sampling of diverse previously-trained student models to train the loss with various convergence rates of predictions. With the more universally adaptable distillation framework of LKD, we conduct experiments on various datasets such as CIFAR and ImageNet, demonstrating our superior performance without the need for task-specific adjustments. For example, our LKD achieves 73.62% accuracy with the MobileNet model on ImageNet, significantly surpassing our KD baseline by 2.94%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.