Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498776›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Tailored knowledge distillation with automated loss function learning.

Sheng Ran, Tao Huang, Wuyue Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheng RanInstitute of Statistics and Big Data, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Tao HuangThe University of Sydney, Darlington, New South Wales, Australia.
Wuyue YangBeijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Applications (BIMSA), Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-8840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge Distillation (KD) is one of the most effective and widely used methods for model compression of large models. It has achieved significant success with the meticulous development of distillation losses. However, most state-of-the-art KD losses are manually crafted and task-specific, raising questions about their contribution to distillation efficacy. This paper unveils Learnable Knowledge Distillation (LKD), a novel approach that autonomously learns adaptive, performance-driven distillation losses. LKD revolutionizes KD by employing a bi-level optimization strategy and an iterative optimization that differentiably learns distillation losses aligned with the students' validation loss. Building upon our proposed generic loss networks for logits and intermediate features, we derive a dynamic optimization strategy to adjust losses based on the student models' changing states for enhanced performance and adaptability. Additionally, for a more robust loss, we introduce a uniform sampling of diverse previously-trained student models to train the loss with various convergence rates of predictions. With the more universally adaptable distillation framework of LKD, we conduct experiments on various datasets such as CIFAR and ImageNet, demonstrating our superior performance without the need for task-specific adjustments. For example, our LKD achieves 73.62% accuracy with the MobileNet model on ImageNet, significantly surpassing our KD baseline by 2.94%.

Indexed as

DistillationLearningMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansKnowledgeNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40498776
PMCPMC12157245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.