ArticlePloS one2025
Extraction, purification, in vitro antioxidant and cytoprotective ability of oligostilbenes from paeonia seeds threshing residues.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOligostilbenes, which have been associated with multiple biological activities, are a kind of oligomeric resveratrol compound and widely exist in Paeonia seeds threshing residues. The re-use of the Paeonia seeds threshing residues as value-added materials is, not only cost-effective, but also environmentally beneficial. It is therefore important to develop a high-efficiency method for extraction of oligostilbenes.
methodsIn this investigation, different extraction methods (soxhlet extraction, high temperature and pressure extraction, cold soaking extraction, heat reflux extraction, and ultrasonic extraction) were used to extract oligostilbenes from Paeonia seeds threshing residues. By comparing the extraction yield and in vitro antioxidant ability of oligostilbenes obtained from different extraction ways, the optimal extraction technology of Paeonia seeds threshing residues oligostilbenes was selected. The macroporous resin was used to purify oligostilbenes crude extract samples, and the purification conditions were determined. The protective effect of purified oligostilbenes on oxidative damage of MODE-K cells was evaluated.
resultsUltrasonic extraction with ethanol (UA-E) possessed the highest extraction yield of oligostilbenes, and the extraction yield was (3.45 ± 0.07)%. The oligostilbenes extracts obtained by different extraction methods had scavenging ability on DPPH· and ABTS+·, and UA-E showed relatively stronger scavenging ability at different concentration levels. The best resin for purifying oligostilbenes was X-5, and the adsorption and desorption rates were (93.12 ± 0.16)% and (91.33 ± 0.40)%, respectively. The optimal adsorption/desorption conditions were sample loading rate of 2 BV/h, ethanol concentration of 70%, and elution flow rate of 1.0 BV/h. There was a dose-response relationship between the scavenging ability of purified oligostilbenes on DPPH· and ABTS+· and the concentration of the samples. The oligostilbenes could relieve the oxidation effect of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on MODE-K cells, and enhance the protection of MODE-K cells by regulating the relative SOD activity, MDA, and ROS production.
conclusionThis research lays a theoretical foundation and scientific reference for the extraction, purification and application of Paeonia seed threshing residues in food and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.