ArticlePloS one2025
The bacterial burden on computer keyboards across selected university facilities at Liverpool John Moores University, City Campus, Byrom Street, Liverpool.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial burden within universities is important to investigate due to the high footfall of both students and staff, who may bring contaminants from body fluids, food, and the environment. These bacterial contaminants may be harmful to both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals. A focus on online resources and communication with workplaces and universities bring an important issue of computer keyboards and mice becoming potential reservoirs for such bacteria.This study aimed to investigate the presence of bacteria on computer keyboards and mice across the Liverpool John Moores University campus by detecting the presence of bacterial growth, identifying these bacteria and the role of disinfection in lowering the bacterial counts and changing their diversity. MATERIALS AND
methodA total of 478 pre- and post-treatment swab samples were taken using sterile cotton swabs moistened in sterile nutrient broth (Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™) from both the keyboards and mice of facilities across the university campus were cultured at 37°C on blood agar plates. A total period of 30 minutes elapsed between first sampling (pre-treatment) and disinfection before the second sampling (post-treatment). Identification of isolated bacterial species was done with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry according to protocol by BioMérieux VITEK® MS prime.
resultsOne hundred and fifty-four (64.4%) of pre-treatment and Forty-nine (20.5%) of post-treatment cultures showed microbial growth, which were identified as various species of Gram-positive cocci, Gram positive bacilli and Gram-negative cocci. DISCUSSION: Across the Liverpool John Moores campus computer keyboards and mice were found to be contaminated with many bacteria, all of which were identified as opportunistic and therefore are not likely to cause harm to healthy individuals. However, there is a greater risk of infection to immunocompromised individuals, which could lead to co-morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.