ArticlePloS one2025
Simultaneous EEG-fNIRS study of visual cognitive processing: ERP analysis and decision-related hemodynamic responses in healthy adults.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expectation Violation Influences Neural Responses to the Accessibility of Cognitions Related to Suicide and Life: A Simultaneous EEG-fNIRS Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Multimodal EEG-fNIRS classification as a clinical tool for bipolar disorder diagnosis.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Prefrontal fNIRS hemodynamic correlates of attentional load during rapid serial visual presentation tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the neural and hemodynamic underpinnings of intentional memory processing through a multimodal approach combining electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Data were drawn from a publicly available dataset in which participants viewed visual scenes and decided whether to remember them, enabling classification into four experimental conditions based on motivation and subsequent memory performance: Want to Remember and Remembered (RR), Want to Remember but Forgot (RF), Did Not Want to Remember but Remembered (FR), and Did Not Want to Remember and Forgot (FF). EEG analyses focused on event-related potentials (ERPs) during the first second following stimulus presentation. The RR and RF conditions showed enhanced ERP amplitudes, particularly in parietal and occipital channels, peaking around 300 ms post-stimulus. Time-frequency analysis using wavelet transform further revealed greater theta and low alpha power in the RR and RF conditions, again especially in parietal and occipital regions. fNIRS analysis examined hemodynamic responses during the subsequent 9-second decision period. While visual inspection revealed variability in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) levels across channels and conditions, statistical analyses using Cohen's D and one-way ANOVA did not identify any significant differences between the conditions ([Formula: see text] > 0.05). These findings suggest that while EEG metrics capture early, intention-driven neural dynamics, fNIRS may reflect more distributed and variable patterns of cognitive engagement. The integration of EEG and fNIRS provides a comprehensive framework for investigating cognitive motivation and memory, highlighting the temporal and spatial signatures of intentional memory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.