ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
GFAP/UCH-L1 as a Biomarker for Rapid Assessment of Mild TBI in Emergency Departments.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Blood-Based Biomarkers After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with GCS 15 in a Singapore Emergency Department: An Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Age- and Sex-Related Differences in GFAP and UCH-L1 Levels in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Do Serum Brain Biomarkers Differentiate the Hemorrhagic Head Injury Lesion Phenotypes? An Interim Analysis of an On-Going Randomized Clinical Trial.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Development of a monoclonal antibody-based time-resolved fluorescence immunochromatographic assay strip for rapid and quantitative determination of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in serum.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Observational
- Early Risk Stratification of Severe Trauma in the Emergency Department: Integrating Clinical Scoring Systems, Dynamic Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence-A Narrative Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: A New Era in Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and disability in Western countries. The diagnosis of TBI mainly involves computed tomography (CT), and Glasgow Coma Scale assessment. As frequent use of CT is associated with excessive radiation exposure, discovery of a biomarker for TBI could reduce unnecessary head CT scans. Thus, the main aim of this study was to evaluate a TBI assessment kit measuring glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), for its suitability to diagnose mild TBI in emergency departments (EDs). MATERIAL AND METHODS The records of 123 patients with head injuries admitted to the Clinical Emergency Department of the Regional Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn, Poland between December 2023 and August 2024, were prospectively analyzed. Patients underwent CT, were classified as isolated head injury (IHI, n=61) or injuries beside TBI (non-IHI, n=62), and tested for serum GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations using immuno-chemical chemiluminescence. RESULTS No significant differences in GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations were observed between IHI and Non-IHI patients. While CT showed brain alterations in 7 patients, GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations were above the threshold in 6 patients with brain injury confirmed by CT. The sensitivity of the TBI test was 83.3%, with specificity 29.1%. The sensitivity of GFAP was 83.3% and that of UCH-L1 was 50.0%, with specificities of 37.9% and 65.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Based on our study, further investigations are required before GFAP and UCH-L1 blood test samples can be recommended as an adjunct to CT scans as a standard procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.