ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
Multi-timepoint pattern analysis: improving classification with neural timeseries data.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural predictors of hidden, persistent psychological states at work.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Cross-recurrence quantification analysis captures inter-brain coupling during naturalistic negotiation: a new dynamic approach for hyperscanning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long, naturalistic stimuli are effective in evoking meaningfully differential neural response patterns between groups. However, the resulting timeseries data often have a high number of features compared to a limited sample size, increasing the likelihood of overfitting and reducing predictive power. This paper introduces multi-timepoint pattern analysis (MTPA) as a temporal dimension reduction approach for improving prediction accuracy when building models with long neural timeseries data. Using feature selection with elastic net regression, MTPA identifies predictive neural patterns while preserving the temporal structure and interpretability of the data. Across two experiments with distinct populations and objectives, MTPA demonstrated consistent advantages over approaches using principal component analysis, windowed averaging, and no dimension reduction. Experiment 1 predicted persistent work-related psychological states in business professionals, achieving accuracies up to 79.1%. Experiment 2 predicted cognitive load and narrative context during video viewing in undergraduates, with accuracies up to 66.5%. These findings suggest that MTPA may be a useful tool for analysing neural data from extended naturalistic designs, enabling researchers to improve prediction accuracy across diverse outcomes and obtain new insights into the temporal dynamics of neural responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.