ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
The great phage escape: Activating and escaping lactococcal antiphage systems.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting lactococcal abortive infection-like antiphage systems: diversity, structures, and mechanisms.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- The great phage escape: Activating and escaping lactococcal antiphage systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the number of newly discovered systems that bacteria use to combat bacteriophages is increasing at an impressive rate. To obtain mechanistic insights into several antiphage systems identified in previous studies, we isolated 66 phage escape mutants which had become insensitive to 13 distinct, plasmid-encoded lactococcal phage resistance systems (i.e. Rhea, Kamadhenu, Rugutis, Audmula, PARIS, type II CBASS, Septu, AbiA, AbiB, AbiD/F, AbiG, AbiJ, AbiP). Genome analysis of these phage escape mutants identified a total of 15 mutated genes. Six of the encoded proteins appear to activate specific antiphage systems. Furthermore, AbiA escape mutants were found to be insensitive to AbiJ, while distinct antiphage systems (AbiG and AbiP) were observed to be activated by a major phage tail protein, indicating mechanistic commonalities. PARIS homologues encoded by members of different bacterial genera appear to share similar sensing mechanisms, whereas our data indicate mechanistic differences between Septu homologues from different genera. Based on our escape mutant sequence analysis, previously predicted domains, and experimental data using the purified endolysin of phage c2, we propose that Audmula modifies the cell wall of the host bacterium, delaying cell lysis and release of progeny phages, protecting the host cell by a heretofore unknown mode of action. The obtained advances in our understanding of lactococcal antiphage mechanisms provide fundamental insights into phage-host interactions, which undoubtedly benefits the dairy industry but may also be useful for biotechnological or biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.