ArticleJACC. Asia2025
Interpretable Independent Recurrent Networks for Forecasting Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Far Can Time-Series Models Go in Capturing Dynamic Stroke Risk Post Atrial Fibrillation?JACC. Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for transient ischemic attack (TIA)/ischemic stroke (IS).
objectivesGiven the dynamic nature of IS risk, this study aimed to predict IS risk in AF patients using a high-dimensional time-series model.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study at the National Taiwan University Hospital from 2014 to 2019, including 7,710 AF patients, with external validation in 6,822 patients from the National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch. The Forecasting Strokes via Interpretable Independent Networks (ForeSIIN) model, based on gated recurrent units, was proposed. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test evaluated risk group differences.
resultsThe annual TIA/IS incidence rate ranged from 181.96 (95% CI: 164.42-200.93) to 15.81 (95% CI: 12.38-20.18) per 1,000 person-years, with an overall incidence of 42.40 (95% CI: 39.60-45.39). The ForeSIIN model achieved the best prediction with an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.764 (95% CI: 0.722-0.810), compared with the CHA
conclusionsThe innovative ForeSIIN model demonstrated accurate stroke prediction in AF patients and enhanced the interpretation of dynamic risk factors over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.