ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Meat productivity of beef steers of different genotypes in Saryesik-Atyrau desert conditions.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant climatic changes, driven by an increase in average annual temperature and a decrease in precipitation, have led to extreme conditions for animal husbandry, including beef cattle breeding. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the meat productivity of Aberdeen-Angus, Hereford, and Kazakh white-headed breeds raised in the climatic conditions of farms in the Saryesik-Atyrau desert region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Quantitative productivity characteristics were assessed through controlled slaughtering of nine animals (three from each breed), with an initial weight of 400 kg ± 10 kg. Qualitative indicators of meat raw material were determined using arbitration methods. Morphometric analysis of carcass weight indices revealed the influence of dimensional differences inherent to the different genotypes. The maximum carcass measurements and post-slaughter weight were observed in Hereford bulls, while Aberdeen bulls had the smallest measurements (P < 0.05). The Kazakh white-headed breed exhibited intermediate values compared to the specialized meat breeds. The quality indicators of meat raw material were more significantly influenced by breed characteristics. Thus, meat from Hereford and Kazakh white-headed breeds showed higher (P < 0.05) protein content (17.1-18.2%) compared to Aberdeen, in which fatty tissue predominated (17.9%), compared to 12-14% in the other breeds. This higher fat content in Aberdeen meat was associated with a greater energy value, by 1287-1789 kJ per kilogram of meat, while the protein content was higher in Hereford meat. In conclusion, the genetically determined qualitative and quantitative characteristics of meat productivity are preserved even under extreme desert conditions. Given the similar indicators of meat productivity across these breeds under temperature stress, it is possible to select livestock for fattening based on the target parameters of meat raw material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40498354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.