ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Vitamin D status and its determinants among Chinese infants and toddlers in Hong Kong.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Vitamin DFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVitamin D is a micronutrient that is necessary for bone health as well as the regulation of mineral homeostasis. This study aims to assess the vitamin D status and its determinants among infants and toddlers in Hong Kong, two of the most vulnerable groups at risk of vitamin D insufficiency.
methodsA multi-centre cross-sectional study recruiting 887 infants and toddlers was conducted. A comprehensive assessment on potential factors that can influence vitamin D status as well as serum vitamin D concentration was conducted for all participants. Regression analyses were conducted to assess the factors contributing to the vitamin D insufficiency risk.
results124 (14.0%) infants and toddlers were vitamin D insufficient and 44 (5.0%) were vitamin D deficient, with higher prevalence observed among younger infants (aged 2 to 6 months). Majority did not consume any vitamin D-containing supplement (86.5%) which was associated with higher risk of vitamin D insufficiency (aOR = 2.16, p = 0.017). An increment of 100IU in total daily vitamin D intake lowered the risk of vitamin D insufficiency (aOR = 0.50, p < 0.001) in older infants and toddlers. Being breastfed increased vitamin D insufficiency risk in younger infants (aOR = 24.91, p < 0.001) and in older infants and toddlers (aOR = 7.36, p < 0.001). Further analyses identified distinctive pattern among factors that can influence 25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentrations.
conclusionLow total vitamin D intake and lack of supplementation practice were the key contributing factors to vitamin D insufficiency among infants and toddlers in Hong Kong. Detailed guidelines and support should be provided to meet their respective daily vitamin D intake requirement to further tackle the vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency among these vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.