ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Discriminating heat stress and feed scarcity in Bali cattle using multivariate trait analysis.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal production systems are challenged by environmental stressors with heat stress and feed scarcity being the most significant factors affecting production, reproduction, and health status. These concurrent challenges create compounding effects where cattle already struggling with thermoregulation further exacerbates with nutrient deficits.
aimThis study aims to evaluate and validate the effectiveness of multivariate statistical analysis in accurately discriminating between the effects of feed scarcity and heat stress using physiological and physical traits of Bali cattle as diagnostic markers.
methodsPhysiological and physical traits of 83 heads of Bali cattle raised with different management systems of heat stress restricted feed (HSRF), heat stress well-feed (HSWF), and temperature normal well-feed (TNWF). Samples were sorted and quality control to ensure data reliability. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify the most influential traits, while Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) were applied to classify cattle based on management conditions. Clustering analysis further validated the grouping pattern of traits associated with each system.
resultsMultivariate analysis effectively distinguished Bali cattle based on management conditions. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified rectal temperature (TR) and body weight (BW) as the most influential traits differentiating cattle under varying stressors. Clustering analysis showed a strong grouping pattern corresponding to management systems, confirming that TNWF provided optimal conditions, while HSWF was manageable due to cattle's ability to tolerate a single stressor. However, HSRF negatively impacted cattle performance, as multiple stressors led to physiological strain. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) successfully classified cattle within their respective management groups, demonstrating the robustness of multivariate approaches in evaluating adaptation and performance under different environmental conditions. These findings confirm the effectiveness of multivariate analysis in distinguishing cattle under different management systems. The identified key traits reinforce the utility of this approach in improving management strategies to optimize cattle performance and resilience under heat stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40498267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.