Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498266›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Disease of the Skeleton: Current Concepts.

Chloe Chose, Guston Zervoudakis, Thomas Karadimas, Thien Huong Huynh, Sean Lapp, Jonathan Henning, Ashley Lamba, David Joyce, Odion Binitie, Hakob Kocharyan and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chloe ChoseMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA. cchose@usf.edu.
Guston ZervoudakisDepartment of Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Thomas KaradimasMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
Thien Huong HuynhMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
Sean LappMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
Jonathan HenningMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
Ashley LambaZucker School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, 11549, USA.
David JoyceDepartment of Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Odion BinitieDepartment of Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Hakob KocharyanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Vaiva GustainyteDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Mustafa Al-RoubaieDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Alexander LazaridesDepartment of Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWith recent advances in systemic cancer treatment, the number of patients with metastatic disease to the skeleton have drastically increased. Patients are now living longer with metastatic disease, leading to a rise in skeletal lesions requiring intervention due to symptomatology, compromised structural integrity with concern for impending fracture, or both. In this review, we discuss current interventional oncology techniques in the treatment of metastatic disease to the skeleton, focusing on advancements in the fields of interventional radiology and orthopedic surgery. RECENT

findingsMultidisciplinary teams now possess vast armamentariums of minimally invasive treatment modalities to address metastatic disease of the skeleton for both palliative and tumoricidal effect. Vascular control is achieved with transarterial embolization, halving intraoperative blood loss in hypervascular lesions. Ablation techniques such as radiofrequency, microwave, cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and chemical consistently reduce pain scores and provide local tumoricidal effects with low complication rates. Cementoplasty, percutaneous fixation, and photodynamic bone stabilization reinforce affected bone to prevent or treat fractures, Finally, hybrid approaches, including ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation combine minimally invasive options and successfully promote tumor control, alleviate pain, and provide stability, with low morbidity. Current evidence supports a paradigm shift from open surgery toward minimally invasive, image-guided interventions for metastatic skeletal disease. When tailored to lesion biology, anatomical location, and patient goals, these techniques deliver durable palliation, mechanical stability, and local tumor control with fewer risks, making them first-line considerations for many patients with metastatic involvement of the skeleton.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresHumansAblationInterventional oncologyMetastatic diseaseMinimally invasivePercutaneous fixationSkeletal metastases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.