ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025
Chronic Fatigue in Cancer Survivorship: Psychiatry Versus Oncology or Psychiatry with Oncology?
Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Psychological Factors and Treatment Experiences Associated With Chemotherapy Side-Effect Expectations and Symptom Severity: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis exacerbates cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients via neuroimmune-endocrine indicators.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a prevalent and debilitating symptom among breast cancer survivors with a significant adverse impact on quality of life. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current understanding of CRF's complex pathophysiology, including the interplay of inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and psychosocial mechanisms, and evaluates diverse intervention strategies. RECENT
findingsNon-pharmacologic approaches (e.g., structured exercise, cognitive-behavioural therapy, mindfulness) have the strongest evidence for alleviating CRF and are emphasized as first-line treatments in oncology guidelines (e.g., ASCO, NCCN, ESMO). In contrast, pharmacologic options such as psychostimulants or bupropion show only modest benefits, with mixed efficacy and notable side effects, underscoring their limited role. Comparing oncology-focused guidelines with those for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) which are psychiatry-focused highlight key differences in management approaches and the need for a unified, multidisciplinary framework across specialties. Modern multidisciplinary, individualized survivorship care, integrating oncologic, psychosocial, and rehabilitative strategies call for adoption of updated, integrated clinical guidelines to optimally address CRF. By consolidating evidence and expert recommendations, this review aims to inform and enhance the clinical management of CRF and improve survivorship outcomes for breast cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.