Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498251›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2025

The importance of sheep genetics and diversity: a bibliometric review.

Concepta McManus, Daniel Pimentel, Vinícius Silva Junqueira, Felipe Pimentel, Vanessa Peripolli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Concepta McManusCentro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura (CENA), Universidade de São Paulo, 13416-000, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-8962
Daniel PimentelCentro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura (CENA), Universidade de São Paulo, 13416-000, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-4720
Vinícius Silva JunqueiraBayer Crop Science, 38057-049, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-1902
Felipe PimentelUniversidade Anhembi Morumbi, Campus Avenida Paulista, 01310-200, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7016-5255
Vanessa PeripolliInstituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, 89245-000, Araquari, Santa Catarina, Brasil. vanessa.peripolli@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0463-4727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of published research on sheep genetics and diversity by examining temporal publication trends, identifying thematic patterns through keyword analysis, and exploring citation and collaboration networks. In addition to mapping the evolution of scientific interest in this field, the study evaluates the influence of these research trends on policy development and technological innovation, including patenting activity. By integrating bibliometric indicators with qualitative insights, the study offers a detailed understanding of how research in sheep genetics contributes to the conservation and strategic use of genetic resources. A search of the Scopus database (Elsevier) retrieved over 16,000 papers from more than 1,700 journals. Our findings indicate that the research on this topic is predominantly concentrated in the United States, China, and Australia, with limited data available from countries in Central Africa. This geographical distribution is reflected in funding sources and author affiliations. Major funding sources include China, the European Commission, and Brazil. Leading research institutions are primarily based in Australia, Europe, and New Zealand. More studies are needed in central Africa to address the regional gaps. Small Ruminant Research currently stands as the leading journal in sheep genetics and diversity, closely followed by Animals and Animal Production Science. In the past, however, the Journal of Animal Science and Animal Genetics held more prominence. There is considerable variability in journal impact, with Indian publications generally exhibiting lower impact metrics. Research themes primarily focus on veterinary concerns, including disease resistance, reproduction, and adaptation to climate change. While collaborations between international and academic-corporate partners can enhance the impact of research, the overall level of collaboration remains low. The study also addresses discussions related to policy and patenting, highlighting gaps such as the limited application of findings to local policymaking contexts. Genetic diversity in farm animals is key for resilience, innovation, and sustainability in global food systems. However, there is a significant lack of studies from Central Africa. Major research funding is provided by China, the European Commission, and Brazil, while institutions from Australia, Europe, and New Zealand play a key role. Innovative technologies, such as genomics, are showing a growing research focus. This study highlights the pressing need for diverse research efforts and international collaborations to effectively address global livestock genetics issues.

Indexed as

BibliometricsGenetic VariationSheep, DomesticAnimalsAustraliaSheepAuthorshipCitationsImpactPatentsPublic policies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.