ArticleMolecular diversity2026
PARP1 inhibitors discovery: innovative screening strategies incorporating machine learning and fragment replacement techniques.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PARP1, the most prominent member of the PARP family, mediates DNA repair and cellular stress responses. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) show clinical promise in treating BRCA1/2-mutated or homologous recombination-deficient tumors, particularly in breast and ovarian cancers. However, acquired resistance remains a significant therapeutic challenge. This study developed a PARP1 inhibitor discovery pipeline integrating machine learning with conventional virtual screening methods. We introduced a novel strategy called fragment replacement to generate new compounds with optimized properties. Using the Maybridge compound library, we developed machine learning models to predict inhibitor activity. The Random Forest classifier demonstrated superior performance (AUC = 0.971, accuracy = 0.915) in tenfold cross-validation. This machine learning-driven approach outperformed conventional virtual screening in terms of efficiency. Subsequently, we conducted virtual screening using 2D fingerprints, shapes, and docking to retain the top-ranked ligands based on a standardized score (Z2-score). XP docking and ADMET prediction were used to select two molecules with strong drug-like properties. Fragment replacement was employed to reconstruct 101 new compounds with improved drug-like characteristics and increased activity. After validation, we identified three hits with docking scores between - 11.802kcal/mol and - 10.808kcal/mol, which were superior to the positive control Talazoparib (docking score: - 9.103kcal/mol). MD simulations assessed the binding stability of the compounds to proteins, with all three selected compounds exhibiting good binding stability, thus identifying them as potential candidates for development as PARP1 inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40498229What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.