Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498127›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

The rise and fall of raloxifene use for osteoporosis, 1999-2022.

Freddy F Shogry, Kaleen N Hayes, Sandra Kim, Andrea M Burden, Mina Tadrous, Sulbh Aggarwal, Suzanne M Cadarette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Freddy F ShogryLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1222-8524
Kaleen N HayesLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1122-0071
Sandra KimLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7028-2563
Andrea M BurdenLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-8530
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-6129
Sulbh AggarwalLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3288-2863
Suzanne M CadaretteLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. s.cadarette@utoronto.ca.

Funding

Benefits and Harms of Long-term Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy: Impact of Treatment Length, Type, Switching, and HolidaysR01AG078759 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CADARETTE, SUZANNE, HAYES, KALEEN NICOLE · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078759NIA NIH HHS R01AG078759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relevance of raloxifene in current osteoporosis practice is not clear given concerns about its safety and the introduction of newer therapeutic options. We describe the rise and fall in raloxifene use among older females in Ontario, documenting that it remains an important therapeutic option for osteoporosis in select patients. PURPOSE: Raloxifene has been available in Canada for postmenopausal osteoporosis since 1998. However, its benefit-to-risk ratio became questioned after evidence of increased risk of thrombosis and fatal stroke emerged in the early 2000s. We aimed to describe the use of raloxifene over time.

methodsWe identified community-dwelling females aged ≥ 66 years initiating raloxifene between 1999/05 and 2022/12 through the Ontario Drug Benefit program, plotted the number of incident and prevalent users by calendar year, and estimated persistence with therapy using a 60-day permissible gap. Patient characteristics were described using medical and pharmacy claims within the year prior to initiation.

resultsWe identified 21,896 eligible females (mean age = 74.2 [SD = 6.2] years, 5% fracture history, 57% oral bisphosphonate history). The number of patients initiating raloxifene increased to an annual high of 3,824 in 2001 followed by a 15% drop in 2002 (n = 3,252) before a gradual decline from 2,113 in 2003 to 90 in 2022. In contrast, the number of prevalent users remained >5,000 annually between 2003 and 2011, with a gradual drop from 4,670 in 2012 to 959 in 2022. Overall, 29% persisted with therapy for ≥ 3 years. Besides known population-level treatment trends (increased statins, decreased estrogen therapy), little differences in patient characteristics were identified over time.

conclusionRaloxifene initiation has declined substantially since 2003, and overall utilization has declined rapidly since 2012. While less than 100 initiators were identified annually in recent years, around 1,000 continue to take raloxifene every year. Raloxifene thus remains a relevant option among select patients with osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalRaloxifene HydrochlorideAgedAged, 80 and overDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansOntarioOsteoporotic FracturesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Bone Density Conservation AgentsRaloxifene HydrochlorideHealth services researchOsteoporosisPharmacoepidemiologyRaloxifene hydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID40498127
PMCPMC12403046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.