Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40498039›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Foveal crowding modifies a target's properties under a brief presentation time.

Ziv Siman-Tov, Maria Lev, Uri Polat

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziv Siman-TovSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Maria LevSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Uri PolatSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of chromatic and achromatic visual information is combined and processed in the parvocellular stream; however, they are separate processes at the early stage of the visual cortex. In our previous study, we noted that there is difficulty discriminating the color of a letter target presented at the fovea under a crowded presentation for a short time. Visual crowding occurs when an easily identified isolated stimulus becomes very difficult to identify when it is surrounded by stimuli with similar properties. One opinion is that crowding reduces the ability to identify the target but not its features (e.g., color and texture); however, some studies indicated that the ability to recognize features is also impaired under peripheral crowding conditions. Here, we investigated whether the processing of chromatic information can be impaired at the fovea using a classic crowding experiment when tested at brief presentation times (20, 40, and 120 ms). The participants reported both the target's identity and chromaticity (dual task). We found that the target's identification and color discrimination are impaired when presented for 20-40 ms but that they recover for longer presentation times. This effect is increased when temporal backward masking is added. This finding suggests that crowding resembles masking under brief presentation times and occurs at a later processing stage, after an initial masking stage.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionFovea CentralisPattern Recognition, VisualPerceptual MaskingAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40498039
PMCPMC12166505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.