Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497994›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Antioxidant Bioactive Agents for Neuroprotection Against Perinatal Brain Injury.

Virginia Beretta, Elena Scarpa, Silvia Carloni, Chiara Petrolini, Valentina Dell'Orto, Sebastiano Ravenda, Serafina Perrone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia BerettaNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-6669-2439
Elena ScarpaNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-2252-0592
Silvia CarloniDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3634-3454
Chiara PetroliniNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-0367
Valentina Dell'OrtoNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, 43121 Parma, Italy.
Sebastiano RavendaStress Physiology Lab, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze 11, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Serafina PerroneNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5478-5657

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PE0000006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in supporting proper growth and development. While moderate oxidative stress is essential for activating key metabolic pathways and maintaining normal cellular signaling, excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROSs) can overwhelm the immature antioxidant systems of newborns, potentially leading to cellular damage and impaired physiological function. This vulnerability is particularly pronounced in the central nervous system, where limited detoxification capacity exacerbates the risk of oxidative damage, following hypoxic-ischemic events. Antioxidants agents-such as melatonin, erythropoietin, allopurinol, N-acetylcisteine, selenium, iminobiotin, taurine, and acetyl-L-carnitine-have demonstrated significant neuroprotective effects in preclinical experimental studies, reducing markers of oxidative injury and improving neurological outcomes. These neuroprotective agents have also been evaluated in clinical trials, demonstrating antioxidant effects. A major issue lies in the complexity of neurological damage, which is not associated with a single pathological pathway. Additionally, the inability of these agents to reach effective concentrations within the central nervous system, along with inconsistencies across clinical trials in terms of dosage and administration methods, hinders the ability to obtain robust results. Future efforts should therefore focus on the development of delivery systems capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and on establishing standardized clinical trial protocols and study designs. This educational review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of emerging protective strategies, including antioxidant bioactive agents and nutritional interventions. It also explores the underlying mechanisms of oxidative stress and its impact on neonatal brain injury.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBrain InjuriesNeuroprotectionNeuroprotective AgentsAnimalsHumansInfant, NewbornOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntioxidantsNeuroprotective AgentsReactive Oxygen Speciesbrain injurydrugsneuroprotectionnewborn infantsoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID40497994
PMCPMC12153932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.