ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Workflow for Assessing Particle Counts of Mixed Micro- and Nanoplastics in Exposed Laboratory Animals.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micro- and nanoplastics (NMPs) have recently gained attention as one of the most pervasive and potentially dangerous environmental pollutants. An increasing number of studies have explored the presence and potential health consequences of NMPs exposure, leading to calls for techniques to assess their bioaccumulation. Significant gaps that remain in this growing field of research are methodologies to quantify discrete particle counts of NMPs below 5 μm in size and evaluate the recovery rate of such methods to ensure accuracy and comparability across studies. To address these gaps, we aimed to develop a high-throughput protocol for the extraction, isolation, and quantification of a 1:1 volume mixture of 2 and 0.1 μm pristine fluorescently labeled spherical polystyrene NMPs (PS-NMPs) from mouse tissue, and to determine recovery rates of both sizes to assess the success of the methodology. We found that we were able to successfully recover 85% of 2 μm NMPs and 30% of 0.1 μm NMPs, and that this workflow could be applied to tissues from mice experimentally exposed to a concentration gradient of PS-NMPs to detect differences in accumulation. This methodology is the first to attempt a continuous workflow to assess particle counts of both micro- and nanoplastics from biological tissues, including calculations of recovery rates, and we anticipate that the workflow described here may be applied and modified in future studies to answer outstanding questions regarding the accumulation of small NMPs that may not be addressed with traditional techniques. Additionally, in identifying the significant differences in recovery rates for micro- versus nanoplastics, we highlight the considerations that must be taken into account for nanoplastics that are often not discussed within the NMPs literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.