Trial reportHIV research & clinical practice2025
Evaluating adherence in an active-controlled HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis trial (PrEPVacc) to inform the estimation of HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm.
Trial report in HIV research & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04066881 (A Phase IIb Three-arm, Two-stage HIV Prophylactic Vaccine Trial With a Second Randomisation to Compare TAF/FTC to TDF/FTC as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIb Three-arm, Two-stage HIV Prophylactic Vaccine Trial With a Second Randomisation to Compare TAF/FTC to TDF/FTC as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (TDF/FTC) in active-controlled pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials has been suggested. However, it has not yet been widely applied. In this article, we evaluate adherence to TDF/FTC in the PrEPVacc trial (NCT04066881) and consider how such adherence data could be used to estimate the effectiveness of TDF/FTC and subsequently, HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm in a predominantly female population.
methodsFrom December 2020 to March 2023 participants were recruited into the trial which included a comparison of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF/FTC) to TDF/FTC as PrEP over 26 weeks of follow-up, in Uganda, Tanzania, and South Africa. PrEP adherence was assessed in various ways.
resultsOf 697 participants dispensed TDF/FTC, 87% were female, 54% were ≥ 25 years, and 59% were sex workers. In a random sample (41%) assessed at visit 6 (week 8), 76% had detectable TFV-DP levels, with 22% reaching levels consistent with ≥2 pills/week. Males, Verulam and Mbeya participants, those ≥ 25 years, not single, subsistence fisheries workers, and those who had any STI at baseline were more likely to have higher adherence. Of those assessed at visit 6, 29% were identified as white coat dosing. Estimated (crude) HIV incidence risk reduction ranged from 10% to 65%.
conclusionsTDF/FTC adherence in the PrEPVacc trial was low, with considerable levels of white coat dosing. Inferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of TDF/FTC is a promising approach, however, the approach requires further elaboration and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.