Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497744›Full record

Trial reportHIV research & clinical practice2025

Evaluating adherence in an active-controlled HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis trial (PrEPVacc) to inform the estimation of HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm.

Sheila Kansiime, Christian Holm Hansen, Henry Bern, Julie Fox, David Dunn, Eugene Ruzagira, Richard Hayes, Sheena Mc Cormack

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in HIV research & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04066881 (A Phase IIb Three-arm, Two-stage HIV Prophylactic Vaccine Trial With a Second Randomisation to Compare TAF/FTC to TDF/FTC as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04066881 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase IIb Three-arm, Two-stage HIV Prophylactic Vaccine Trial With a Second Randomisation to Compare TAF/FTC to TDF/FTC as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research UnitRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,512ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsVaccine Group A: DNA-HIV-PT123 and AIDSVAX® B/E (weeks 0,4,24,48), Vaccine Group B: DNA-HIV-PT123 and CN54gp140+MPLA-L (weeks 0,4), then MVA and CN54gp140+MPLA-L (weeks 24,48), Vaccine Group C: Saline placebo (weeks 0,4,24,48), Control PrEP:TDF/FTC once daily (weeks 0-26), Experimental PrEP:TAF/FTC once daily (weeks 0-26)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheila KansiimeUganda Research Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Entebbe, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-1501
Christian Holm HansenMedical Research Council International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Henry BernMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.
Julie FoxKing's College London, London, UK.
David DunnMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.
Eugene RuzagiraUganda Research Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Entebbe, Uganda.
Richard HayesMedical Research Council International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sheena Mc CormackMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (TDF/FTC) in active-controlled pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials has been suggested. However, it has not yet been widely applied. In this article, we evaluate adherence to TDF/FTC in the PrEPVacc trial (NCT04066881) and consider how such adherence data could be used to estimate the effectiveness of TDF/FTC and subsequently, HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm in a predominantly female population.

methodsFrom December 2020 to March 2023 participants were recruited into the trial which included a comparison of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF/FTC) to TDF/FTC as PrEP over 26 weeks of follow-up, in Uganda, Tanzania, and South Africa. PrEP adherence was assessed in various ways.

resultsOf 697 participants dispensed TDF/FTC, 87% were female, 54% were ≥ 25 years, and 59% were sex workers. In a random sample (41%) assessed at visit 6 (week 8), 76% had detectable TFV-DP levels, with 22% reaching levels consistent with ≥2 pills/week. Males, Verulam and Mbeya participants, those ≥ 25 years, not single, subsistence fisheries workers, and those who had any STI at baseline were more likely to have higher adherence. Of those assessed at visit 6, 29% were identified as white coat dosing. Estimated (crude) HIV incidence risk reduction ranged from 10% to 65%.

conclusionsTDF/FTC adherence in the PrEPVacc trial was low, with considerable levels of white coat dosing. Inferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of TDF/FTC is a promising approach, however, the approach requires further elaboration and evaluation.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsMedication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultEmtricitabineFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSouth AfricaTanzaniaTenofovirUgandaYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineTenofoviradherence-efficacycounterfactual placebo HIV incidenceemtricitabine/Tenofovirnon-inferiority pre-exposure prophylaxis trialsPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID40497744
PMCPMC7619267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.