ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Clinical evaluation of two pathogen enrichment approaches for next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential analysis of the lower respiratory tract microbiota between patients with non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and pulmonary tuberculosis.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- A rare case of lung abscess caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in an adult with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples for diagnosing pulmonary infections: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The underdevelopment of microbiological tests has contributed to diagnostic delay and inappropriate use of antibiotics in patients with lower respiratory tract infections, which is ranked as the seventh leading cause of death globally. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a promising platform for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, albeit with high costs and challenges in result interpretation. Here we evaluated two NGS-based pathogen detection assays for the etiological diagnosis of pneumonia in a prospective cohort of 257 patients. Both assays utilized multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for pathogen enrichment. One assay was designed to promiscuously amplify and identify more than 1,000 pathogens (broad-spectrum targeted next-generation sequencing [bs-tNGS]), while the other specifically targeted 194 pathogens (pathogen-specific targeted next-generation sequencing [ps-tNGS]). The analytical and diagnostic performances of both assays were compared using a composite clinical reference standard. The specificity of ps-tNGS was higher than that of bs-tNGS (84.85% vs. 75.00%), while the sensitivities of both assays were similar (>89%). In addition, a significant overlap in the frequently detected pathogens by the two methods was observed. Moreover, the enrichment of pathogens via multiplex PCR for ps-tNGS has alleviated the requirement for deep sequencing in the shotgun metagenomic workflows and thus dramatically lowered the assay cost. This study demonstrated that ps-tNGS achieved a better overall diagnostic performance and may potentially replace bs-tNGS in the clinical application.IMPORTANCEMicrobial enrichment in metagenomic next-generation sequencing has been achieved through differential cell lysis, but the results varied, depending on experimental procedures and sample types. Therefore, direct enrichment of pathogen DNA/RNA was attempted via multiplex PCR or hybrid probe capture (targeted next-generation sequencing [tNGS]). We evaluated two enrichment methods based on multiplex PCR. One method utilized a primer design strategy to amplify over 1,000 respiratory pathogens (bs-tNGS), while the other specifically targeted 194 pathogens (ps-tNGS). Our findings disavowed the notion that "the more, the better" in tNGS workflows, since ps-tNGS exhibited equivalent sensitivity and, notably, higher specificity than bs-tNGS in a prospective cohort of 257 patients who were suspected of having pneumonia. In future evaluations of tNGS assays, researchers should pay more attention to diagnostic specificity, rather than focusing solely on sensitivity, since a low specificity may potentially lead to misdiagnosis and overuse of antibiotics in cases of non-infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.