ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Race and Ethnicity in Heart Failure Trials: Time to Update Recommended Categories for Global Relevance.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Case for Gulf Region-Specific Peripheral Artery Disease Trials:Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Health Status in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Asia: Insights From Global Trials.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Article
- Understanding Geographic Variations in Heart Failure Clinical Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe collection of race and ethnicity data in clinical trials using standardized categories is recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration, although this is primarily for domestic reasons. The applicability and understanding of the categories in multinational trials are uncertain.
methodsWe analyzed patient-level data from 13 major heart failure trials, examining race and ethnicity data recorded by country, as recommended by the Food and Drug Administration: "American Indian or Alaska Native," "Asian," "Black or African American," "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander," and "White" for race and "Hispanic or Latino" as a minimum for ethnicity (with an expanded list of ethnicities available).
resultsOf the 54 087 patients studied, approximately 32.3% were women. In the United States, 77% of patients were reported to be of White race and 19% of Black race with very few assigned to another race category (1% Asian, 0.7% Native American, 0.2% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific islander, and 1.4% "other"). In Europe, race was almost uniformly reported as White, and a similar racial homogeneity was reported in Asia (Asian race). Conversely, in Latin America, 8.9% of patients were described as "American Indian or Alaska Native," with a very high proportion in specific countries (eg, 36% in Guatemala and 21% in Mexico). In the United States, 6.2% of participants were reported to have Hispanic/Latino ethnicity but most patients in Latin America were reported to have this ethnicity; conversely, few patients had this ethnicity reported outside the Americas, including in Spain and Portugal. Among patients designated as Asian race, specific ethnicities (eg, Indian, Japanese etc) almost completely overlapped with the country of origin.
conclusionsThis study highlights the challenges of applying standardized race and, particularly, ethnicity categories in global clinical trials. A multistakeholder approach is needed to improve the collection of race and ethnicity data in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.