ArticleeLife2025
A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging.
Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Buffering of gene dosage response curves for human complex traits.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Psychosis as a multisystem disorder of aberrant aging.npj aging · 2026Review
- Blood biochemical and gut microbiotic neural network models forecasting human biological age.Aging · 2026Article
- Isoswitching drives the aging process in human brains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multimodal Computational Approach for Forecasting Cardiovascular Aging Based on Immune and Clinical-Biochemical Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Equation Built by Multiple Adaptive Regression Spline to Estimate Biological Age in Healthy Postmenopausal Women in Taiwan.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Towards Healthy Longevity: Comprehensive Insights from Molecular Targets and Biomarkers to Biological Clocks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Why people age at different rates is a fundamental, unsolved problem in biology. We created a model that predicts an individual's age from physiological traits that change with age in the large UK Biobank dataset, such as blood pressure, lung function, strength, and stimulus-reaction time. The model predicted a person's age with best accuracy when it heavily weighted traits that together query multiple organ systems, arguing that most or all physiological systems (lung, heart, brain, etc.) contribute to the global phenotype of chronological age. Differences between calculated 'biological' age and chronological age (∆Age) appear to reflect an individual's relative youthfulness, as people predicted to be young for their age had a lower subsequent mortality rate and a higher parental age at death, even though no mortality data were used to calculate ∆Age. Remarkably, the effect of each year of physiological ∆Age on Gompertz mortality risk was equivalent to that of one chronological year. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ∆Age and analysis of environmental factors associated with ∆Age identified known as well as new factors that may influence human aging, including genes involved in synapse biology and a tendency to play computer games. We identify a small number of readily measured physiological traits that together assess a person's biological age and may be used clinically to evaluate therapeutics designed to slow aging and extend healthy life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.