Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497443›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging.

Sergiy Libert, Alex Chekholko, Cynthia Kenyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Isoswitching drives the aging process in human brains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sergiy LibertCalico Life Sciences, South San Francisco, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-5390
Alex ChekholkoCalico Life Sciences, South San Francisco, United States.
Cynthia KenyonCalico Life Sciences, South San Francisco, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-2636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why people age at different rates is a fundamental, unsolved problem in biology. We created a model that predicts an individual's age from physiological traits that change with age in the large UK Biobank dataset, such as blood pressure, lung function, strength, and stimulus-reaction time. The model predicted a person's age with best accuracy when it heavily weighted traits that together query multiple organ systems, arguing that most or all physiological systems (lung, heart, brain, etc.) contribute to the global phenotype of chronological age. Differences between calculated 'biological' age and chronological age (∆Age) appear to reflect an individual's relative youthfulness, as people predicted to be young for their age had a lower subsequent mortality rate and a higher parental age at death, even though no mortality data were used to calculate ∆Age. Remarkably, the effect of each year of physiological ∆Age on Gompertz mortality risk was equivalent to that of one chronological year. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ∆Age and analysis of environmental factors associated with ∆Age identified known as well as new factors that may influence human aging, including genes involved in synapse biology and a tendency to play computer games. We identify a small number of readily measured physiological traits that together assess a person's biological age and may be used clinically to evaluate therapeutics designed to slow aging and extend healthy life.

Indexed as

AgingModels, TheoreticalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeUnited Kingdomagingbiological clockcognitioncomputational biologyGWAShealth spanhumansystems biologyUKBB

Identifiers

PMID40497443
PMCPMC12158426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.