Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497304›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2026

Age equality in mental health: Déjà vu all over again.

Polly Kaiser, Kathryn Dykes, Natasha Lord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Polly KaiserGreater Manchester Mature Minds Matter, Greater Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9154-9690
Kathryn DykesGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK.
Natasha LordNatasha Lord, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Cannock, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAgeism is one of the last socially accepted prejudices. This paper aims to highlight key areas of age discrimination and inequality in mental health services. DISCUSSION: It will discuss examples, drawn mainly from the UK, in terms of mental health inequalities to illustrate age inequality. It will define what is meant by 'older people' before discussing ageism and age equality. Examples will be given of the impact of ageism has on the mental health of older people themselves, the impact of institutional ageism on the unequal access older people have to age-appropriate services. Additionally, as older people present differently, their needs are not always recognised. This demonstrates the need for further training and education for health and social care professionals.

conclusionIt will conclude with hope and encouragement for action with possible ideas to take forward to continue to address this. It calls for allies to address 'Everyday Ageism' and will signpost readers to resources that may assist them in their endeavours to challenge this.

Indexed as

AgeismAgingHealthcare DisparitiesMental HealthMental Health ServicesAgedHumansUnited Kingdomagingdepressionolder adultssuicidetrauma

Identifiers

PMID40497304
PMCPMC13456372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.