Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497290›Full record

Trial reportActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Lung cancer screening in Finland: a prospective randomized trial.

Viktor Wichmann, Sanna Iivanainen, Lauri Mattila, Veli-Pekka Kokkonen, Airi Jartti, Antti Kurtti, Riitta Kaarteenaho, Heidi Andersen, Antti Jekunen, Tuula Vasankari and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Viktor WichmannCancer Center Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Sanna IivanainenCancer Center Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Lauri MattilaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Veli-Pekka KokkonenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Airi JarttiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Antti KurttiUniversity of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Riitta KaarteenahoCenter of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, and Research Unit of Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Heidi AndersenVaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland; University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Antti JekunenVaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland; University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tuula VasankariFilha, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi KoivunenCancer Center Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland. jussi.koivunen@pohde.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening can shift diagnoses to early-stage disease and improve survival. However, LDCT has several challenges such as high false positive rate and indefinite cost-effectiveness. We report here secondary and exploratory endpoints of the Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer combined with different smoking cessation approach in Finland (LDCT-SC-FI) study including recruitment channels, LDCT performance, and long-term smoking cessation.

methodsIn this study, we randomized 200 current smokers with a significant smoking history in 1:1 fashion to receive a smartphone application or standard of care written materials, both for smoking cessation. All underwent LDCT screening at baseline and at 1-year. Participants were recruited through multiple channels, including newspapers, internet advertisements, and healthcare referrals.

resultsNewspaper advertisements were the most effective recruitment method, accounting for 74.5% of participants while minority came through referrals (2.5%). LDCT screening demonstrated uptake of 96.7% for both rounds combined. Six lung cancers were detected with a positive predictive value of 75%. Of the detected lung cancers, five were at stage I and all of these underwent curative intent treatment. Smoking cessation rates at 1-year were higher in the application (18.3%) than in the control arm (12.8%), though the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-3.41).

interpretationThis study suggests that LDCT screening for lung cancer is feasible in Finland. The screening examination uptake was high with both screening rounds, while the positive predictive value for lung cancer detection remained at good level.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsProspective StudiesSmokingSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID40497290
PMCPMC12171981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.