ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
An Anatomical Study of Median Nerve Branches for Distal Nerve Transfer in Isolated Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technical progress and clinical application of distal nerve transfers.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Isolated anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) syndrome is a forearm compression neuropathy. A viable treatment for the syndrome is distal nerve transfer. However, the option of a donor nerve branch from the median nerve remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable median nerve branch for distal nerve transfer in AIN syndrome patients by evaluating nerve diameter, fascicle and axon count, and distance between donor and recipient nerves. Methods: Twenty cadaveric arms were dissected to examine the AIN as the recipient nerve. Candidate donor nerves included branches to the palmaris longus (PL), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and first and second branches of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS1 and FDS2). Each nerve length and the distance between donor and recipient nerves were measured. Histochemical staining was used to measure cross-sectional diameter and axon count. Results: All donor nerves had sufficient length for transfer, with FCR providing the greatest length (32.8 mm) and causing the least postoperative tension. Among the studied nerves, AIN had the largest diameter (2.3 ± 0.4 mm), followed by FCR (2.1 ± 0.3 mm), PL (2.0 ± 0.4 mm), FDS2 (1.6 ± 0.6 mm), and FDS1 (1.5 ± 0.3 mm). The AIN also had the highest average axon count (2747 ± 710), compared with FDS2 (888 ± 458), FCR (869 ± 366), PL (678 ± 277), and FDS1 (426 ± 192). Conclusions: The FCR branch transfer may not be the definitive best option for AIN palsy; however, it remains a highly viable and effective choice for reinnervation, providing a good alternative in cases where other donor nerves present anatomical or functional limitations. Clinical relevance: This study provides anatomical and histological insights into the optimal median nerve branches for AIN transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.