Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497270›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025

Development of a Core Outcomes Set for Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Christopher J Dy, Alison L Antes, Heather L Baltzer, Harvey Chim, Jana Dengler, Lisa Gfrerer, Scott H Kozin, Yusha Katie Liu, Christine B Novak, Hollie A Power and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ongoing Clinical Challenges in Nerve Surgery (Nerve SPACE 2025).Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christopher J DyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Alison L AntesDivision of General Medicine & Geriatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Heather L BaltzerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Harvey ChimDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Jana DenglerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Lisa GfrererDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.
Scott H KozinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA.
Yusha Katie LiuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Christine B NovakDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Hollie A PowerDivision of Plastic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Nicholas PulosDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Sciences, Rochester, MN.
Jeffrey G StepanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
COMET Nerve Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The contemporary literature evaluating outcomes after peripheral nerve injury (PNI) does not rigorously and adequately address the domains (motor, sensory, function, and pain) experienced by patients. Our goal was to develop a core outcomes set (COS) to evaluate outcomes after PNI. Methods: We adhered to recommended guidelines for COS development. Following a systematic review of the literature, we assembled a panel of experts and used a modified Delphi to assess the appropriateness of candidate measures to evaluate recovery after PNI. We convened 20 experts in PNI using two initial electronic surveys, one in-person meeting, and a final electronic survey. We arrived at consensus (≥70% of panelists) for required and recommended measures to evaluate outcomes after PNI. Results: Our panel arrived at consensus for motor, sensory, function, and pain outcomes in patients after upper and lower extremity nerve injury. We designated the measures to use and the timing and administration of these measures. Conclusions: We developed a COS that can be used by clinicians and researchers who evaluate patients with PNI. Our goal is to implement the COS in a unified manner, facilitating comparison in the literature as well as collaboration among centers. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic V.

Indexed as

Core outcomes setFunctionMotorOutcomesPeripheral nerve injury

Identifiers

PMID40497270
PMCPMC12150037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.