Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497267›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025

The Epidemiology of Metacarpal Fractures: A Descriptive Study Based on 18,802 Fractures From the Swedish Fracture Register.

Jakob Deuschl, Henrik Alfort, Maria Wilcke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakob DeuschlDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik AlfortDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria WilckeDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Hand fractures are common injuries, but there are few large and detailed epidemiological reports describing them. Methods: This study describes the distribution of metacarpal fractures and their impact on patient-reported outcome measures based on 18,802 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register. Results: The mean age at the time of injury was 39 years (men 33 years and women 52 years). The age distribution for women was bimodal. For men, there was unimodal peaking in early adulthood. Male injuries represented 70% of all metacarpal fractures. In men and children, the most common fracture was a distal extra-articular fracture of the fifth metacarpal, whereas in women, it was a shaft fracture of the fifth metacarpal. Fracture localization differed between metacarpals; 79% of the fractures in the first metacarpal were proximal, compared with 19% to 25% in the other metacarpals. Shaft fractures were the most common in the third and fourth metacarpals, and distal fractures were the most common in the second and fifth metacarpals. The most common cause of injury was a fall. Fractures of the first metacarpal were treated surgically to a greater extent than fractures in the other metacarpals. Men were operated on more often than women (19% vs 14%). Metacarpal fractures did not affect patient-rated hand function or quality of life 1 year after injury. Conclusions: Metacarpal fractures are common and mostly treated nonsurgically and have a minimal effect on patient well-being. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyHand fracturesMetacarpal fracturesMetacarpals

Identifiers

PMID40497267
PMCPMC12150039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.