ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
The Epidemiology of Metacarpal Fractures: A Descriptive Study Based on 18,802 Fractures From the Swedish Fracture Register.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Biomechanical Analysis of Intramedullary Threaded Nail Fixation and Dorsal Plate and Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Base Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2027Article
- Surgically treated metacarpal fractures in adults: a study with 3286 cases based on the Swedish National Quality Registry for Hand Surgery.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Comparison of Plate Versus Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Extra-Articular Metacarpal Base Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hand fractures are common injuries, but there are few large and detailed epidemiological reports describing them. Methods: This study describes the distribution of metacarpal fractures and their impact on patient-reported outcome measures based on 18,802 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register. Results: The mean age at the time of injury was 39 years (men 33 years and women 52 years). The age distribution for women was bimodal. For men, there was unimodal peaking in early adulthood. Male injuries represented 70% of all metacarpal fractures. In men and children, the most common fracture was a distal extra-articular fracture of the fifth metacarpal, whereas in women, it was a shaft fracture of the fifth metacarpal. Fracture localization differed between metacarpals; 79% of the fractures in the first metacarpal were proximal, compared with 19% to 25% in the other metacarpals. Shaft fractures were the most common in the third and fourth metacarpals, and distal fractures were the most common in the second and fifth metacarpals. The most common cause of injury was a fall. Fractures of the first metacarpal were treated surgically to a greater extent than fractures in the other metacarpals. Men were operated on more often than women (19% vs 14%). Metacarpal fractures did not affect patient-rated hand function or quality of life 1 year after injury. Conclusions: Metacarpal fractures are common and mostly treated nonsurgically and have a minimal effect on patient well-being. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.