ReviewJPRAS open2025
Perioperative Anticoagulation in Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antithrombotic medications, including anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (AP), are used to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with cardiovascular or hypercoagulable conditions. Current guidelines suggest stopping AC/AP therapy 3-5 days before surgery. However, recent evidence suggests that continuation of anticoagulation in certain surgeries, such as urologic and endoscopic procedures, may not increase bleeding risk and could help prevent thromboembolic events. The role of continued AC/AP therapy in hand and wrist surgery remains understudied. Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the latest literature on continuing AC/AP therapy during hand and wrist surgeries and evaluate its impact on bleeding risks and thromboembolic events. Methods: A search of the PubMed and Embase databases identified 149 results, and after screening, 12 relevant studies were included in the review. Results: All 12 studies, including prospective and retrospective cohort studies and a case report, suggest that continuing AC/AP therapy during elective hand surgery generally does not significantly increase bleeding complications. The most common complication was subcutaneous hematoma, which was managed non-surgically. Major hematomas requiring reoperation were rare. A few studies noted higher bleeding complications with warfarin but they supported continuing anticoagulation if the patient's international normalized ratio was <3.5. One case study reported pulmonary embolism after discontinuing warfarin. Conclusion: Continuing AC/AP therapy in most hand surgery patients appears to be safer than interrupting anticoagulation, as the risk of thromboembolic events outweighs the potential bleeding complications. However, further research in larger cohorts and specific hand surgery types is needed for more definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.