ArticleCurrent research in food science2025
AI-driven prediction of bitterness and sweetness and analysis of receptor interactions.
Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Machine learning for food flavor prediction and regulation: models, data integration, and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Intelligent Prediction, Debittering Technologies, and Multi-Dimensional Evaluation for Bitter Peptides.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Computer-aided structural modeling and drug discovery for G-protein-coupled receptors in the age of artificial intelligence.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- EEG Cross-Subject Taste Classification Method: A Meta-Learning Wavelet Graph Convolutional Neural Network Under Sweet and Bitter Stimuli.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Interpretable multitask deep learning models for odor perception based on molecular structure.Current research in food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the molecular mechanisms governing sweetness and bitterness is essential for identifying desirable taste characteristics in natural and synthetic compounds. In this study, we developed graph neural network (GNN)-based artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict bitterness and sweetness based on chemical structure. GNNs utilize deep learning to capture relationships among molecular components within a graph, extracting latent molecular vectors. Unlike conventional methods relying on predefined molecular descriptors, GNNs learn directly from molecular structures, reducing feature selection biases. By enhancing the interpretability of AI-driven predictions, GNNs improve understanding of decision-making. To construct GNN-based predictive models, we compiled datasets of compounds classified as either bitter or sweet. Our models achieved prediction accuracies comparable to or exceeding those of traditional machine learning and deep learning models that rely on molecular descriptors. To enhance model interpretability, we employed the Integrated Gradients method to visualize the molecular features influencing bitterness or sweetness predictions. These visualizations were further validated through molecular docking simulations of ligands on taste receptors, using the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. Bitterness was evaluated using TAS2R16 and sweetness with TAS1R2. The chemical visualization results were then compared with conformational data, demonstrating strong alignment with previous experimental and computational analyses. These findings validate our AI model's accuracy and visualization outcomes, highlighting the potential of GNN-based models in taste prediction. This approach offers a novel framework for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying taste perception. Further investigations are warranted to explore these mechanisms in greater depth and extend this methodology to predict additional taste modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.