ArticleCureus2025
Bone Marrow Findings in Patients With Renal Disease: Experience of a Single Tertiary Care Center in Bihar.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study aimed to characterize bone marrow findings in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Bihar, India, and to identify correlations between these findings and patients' clinical presentations and hematological parameters. Specifically, this study aimed to (1) document the prevalence and patterns of bone marrow abnormalities in CKD patients, (2) analyze associations between bone marrow findings and CKD stages, and (3) investigate relationships between bone marrow changes and hematological parameters, including anemia severity and morphology. Methodology A retrospective, observational study was conducted by analyzing bone marrow findings of 220 CKD cases admitted at a tertiary care hospital in Bihar, India. Patients' demographic details, clinical features, and laboratory data, including complete blood count, peripheral blood smear, renal function tests, and serum protein electrophoresis, were documented. Standard techniques were utilized to perform bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, which were, subsequently, analyzed by two independent hematopathologists. The data were analyzed for correlations between CKD stages, anemia severity, bone marrow findings, and other clinical parameters. Results The study population was predominantly middle-aged males (63.2%) with a high burden of hypertension (90%) and diabetes (46.4%). All patients presented with anemia, with moderate-grade anemia being the most common (45.9%), and the normocytic, normochromic being the most prevalent subtype (48.6%). Bone marrow examination revealed normal trilineage hematopoiesis in 44.1% of cases. Other notable findings included increased plasma cells (23.2%), erythroid hyperplasia (17.7%), and features of dyspoiesis (8.2%). More advanced stages of CKD were associated with greater plasma cell disorder and dyspoietic feature dominance along with erythroid hyperplasia and lower rates of normal hematopoiesis. Dialysis-dependent patients showed higher rates of bone marrow abnormalities compared to non-dialysis CKD patients. Conclusions This study establishes the reference norms for bone marrow changes in CKD patients in Bihar and demonstrates an elaborate spectrum of hematological changes beyond mere renal anemia. The increased prevalence of plasma cell disorders and dyspoietic changes, especially in advanced CKD, underscores the importance of bone marrow examination in patients with undiagnosed cytopenias and suspected paraproteinemias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.