ArticleCureus2025
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Patient With Pulmonary Embolism and Bilateral Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main non-bleeding complication arising from exposure to heparin is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Type I HIT is a non-immune-mediated mild decrease in platelet count, which mostly does not need treatment, and type II HIT is an immune-mediated, severe decrease in platelet count characterized by a significant risk of thrombotic complications requiring immediate treatment. HIT type II is a serious condition that can threaten life due to an immune and thrombotic response that continues to pose diagnostic and management challenges. Due to ineffective alternatives to heparin in certain typical and recurring situations, the disease burden remains unchanged in the U.S. HIT occurs in about 20,000 cases annually, representing one in every 1,500 hospital admissions. For patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (PE), heparin is often employed as an anticoagulant; however, the emergence of HIT in these cases complicates both the treatment plan and management approach. This case illustrates a patient who was diagnosed with a PE and received heparin therapy. Shortly after starting treatment, the patient experienced thrombocytopenia, a key indicator of HIT. A 73-year-old male, while on admission, was noticed to have left upper extremity swelling and increased shortness of breath. A CT chest pulmonary angiogram revealed a positive for acute pulmonary artery embolus in the right lower lobar branch pulmonary artery. Vascular Laboratory (VL) left upper extremity duplex revealed acute occlusive deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the left jugular, subclavian, axillary, and brachial veins and superficial vein thrombosis in basilic and cephalic veins. The patient received an IV heparin bolus and continued on heparin infusion. The platelet count on initiating the heparin drip was 145 K/μL. On hospital day 5, the patient's platelet count dropped to 98 K/μL.The 4Ts for HIT score calculated was 7 points, meaning high probability, and heparin-induced platelet (HIP) antibody was ordered, and heparin drip was discontinued. Argatroban infusion was started. The Hematologist evaluated the patient and stated that the clinical findings were consistent with HIT. The HIP antibody (screening test) resulted positive, and the patient's optical density (O.D) was elevated to 0.536. Later on, the patient was noted to have right upper extremity swelling, and VL duplex upper extremity right veins showed acute occlusive DVT involving the right subclavian vein, axillary vein, brachial vein, and internal jugular vein, and a drop in platelet count to 54 K/μL. The unfractionated heparin (UFH) serotonin release assay, which is the confirmatory test for HIT, resulted positive result. Argatroban dose was increased to the maximum of the therapeutic range, aiming for a partial thromboplastin time of 70-80, as the patient continued to experience thromboses. This led to the recovery of platelets, discontinuation of Argatroban, and transition of the patient to Eliquis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.