ReviewCureus2025
A Comprehensive Review of Arachnoid Cysts.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple midline brain anomalies in a CMV-exposed fetus with successful surgical management: a case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Fourth ventricular pilocytic astrocytoma mimicking an arachnoid cyst: A case report and review of literature.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Primary Adult Ventriculitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae with Obstructive Hydrocephalus: Role of Arachnoid Cyst as a Predisposing Factor.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Lumbar Arachnoid Cyst Presenting as Arachnoiditis on MRI: A Case Report and Diagnostic Approach.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Reversible Cortical Visual Impairment in an Adolescent Due to a Posterior Fossa Arachnoid Cyst: A Case Report.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arachnoid cysts are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled sacs that develop within the arachnoid membrane surrounding the brain or spinal cord, often remaining asymptomatic but occasionally causing neurological symptoms due to mass effect or CSF flow obstruction. The optimal management of these cysts remains debated, balancing conservative observation with surgical intervention. This review analyzes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, treatment options, and future management directions for arachnoid cysts. With a prevalence of approximately 1-2% and a male predominance, these cysts most commonly occur in the Sylvian fissure and posterior fossa. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the gold standard for diagnosis, with diffusion-weighted imaging and cine phase-contrast MRI playing critical roles in differentiating communicating versus non-communicating cyst types and assessing CSF dynamics. Asymptomatic cysts are typically managed conservatively with periodic neuroimaging follow-up, while surgical intervention is reserved for symptomatic cases, particularly those associated with hydrocephalus, seizures, or focal neurological deficits. Treatment strategies include endoscopic fenestration, microsurgical fenestration, and cyst-peritoneal shunting, with endoscopy offering a less invasive option but carrying a higher recurrence risk. Advances in neuroimaging, surgical techniques, and artificial intelligence-driven predictive modeling are refining treatment approaches, while emerging research into molecular mechanisms and minimally invasive robotic-assisted surgery may further optimize outcomes. Future developments in personalized, risk-stratified management protocols may reduce the need for invasive interventions and improve long-term prognoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.