Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497173›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Comprehensive Review of Arachnoid Cysts.

Jen-Yeu Wang, Hamid Hadi, Mohammad Arshad, Eric Whitney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jen-Yeu WangNeurosurgery, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Hamid HadiNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Mohammad ArshadNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Eric WhitneyNeurosurgery, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arachnoid cysts are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled sacs that develop within the arachnoid membrane surrounding the brain or spinal cord, often remaining asymptomatic but occasionally causing neurological symptoms due to mass effect or CSF flow obstruction. The optimal management of these cysts remains debated, balancing conservative observation with surgical intervention. This review analyzes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, treatment options, and future management directions for arachnoid cysts. With a prevalence of approximately 1-2% and a male predominance, these cysts most commonly occur in the Sylvian fissure and posterior fossa. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the gold standard for diagnosis, with diffusion-weighted imaging and cine phase-contrast MRI playing critical roles in differentiating communicating versus non-communicating cyst types and assessing CSF dynamics. Asymptomatic cysts are typically managed conservatively with periodic neuroimaging follow-up, while surgical intervention is reserved for symptomatic cases, particularly those associated with hydrocephalus, seizures, or focal neurological deficits. Treatment strategies include endoscopic fenestration, microsurgical fenestration, and cyst-peritoneal shunting, with endoscopy offering a less invasive option but carrying a higher recurrence risk. Advances in neuroimaging, surgical techniques, and artificial intelligence-driven predictive modeling are refining treatment approaches, while emerging research into molecular mechanisms and minimally invasive robotic-assisted surgery may further optimize outcomes. Future developments in personalized, risk-stratified management protocols may reduce the need for invasive interventions and improve long-term prognoses.

Indexed as

arachnoid cystcystoperitoneal shuntingendoscopic cyst fenestrationmanagement of arachnoid cystmicrosurgical cyst excision

Identifiers

PMID40497173
PMCPMC12151136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.