ArticleClinical & translational immunology2025
Allogeneic 'off-the-shelf' SARS-CoV-2-specific adoptive T-cell therapy for refractory viral infection and end organ disease.
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAR T cell therapy beyond cancer: current status, challenges and future prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Prospective Biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Seroconversion in Patients with Haematological Malignancies.Vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Despite the effective roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines, immunocompromised patients have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Allogeneic adoptive T-cell immunotherapy is now established as an effective approach to treat viral diseases in immunocompromised patients. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of allogeneic virus-specific T-cell therapy in patients with COVID-19. Methods: Using a repository of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells generated from healthy exposed volunteers, we conducted an open-label phase I trial to assess the feasibility and safety of allogeneic SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in immune-compromised cancer patients with COVID-19. Results: Six participants at risk of severe COVID-19 were enrolled and received SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell therapy within 4 days of recruitment. The first five participants who received two infusions of allogeneic SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell therapy experienced no adverse events following treatment. Four of the six participants showed improvement in viral load following treatment and were alive at 12-week follow-up. One participant died 6 days after their second infusion, because of established pulmonary parenchymal damage following prolonged COVID infection. Another, who had underlying lupus nephritis, developed cytokine release syndrome and diffuse alveolar haemorrhage following a single infusion and was withdrawn from the study. They subsequently recovered from this serious adverse event. Conclusion: Allogeneic SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell therapy provides a platform to rapidly administer T cells to high-risk COVID-19 patients. It was associated with a reduced viral load and increased SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses in the majority of treated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.