ArticleCirculation reports2025
Influence of the Presence of Other People on Performing Rescue Actions in Emergency Situations - A Questionnaire Survey.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because bystander performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases is influenced by the number of rescuers/bystanders, we assessed the relationship between the presence of other people and performance of rescue actions in an actual emergency situation. Methods and Results: A cross-sectional study was performed using data from an anonymous self-administered questionnaire-based survey that included laypersons who had encountered emergency situations during the past 5 years. Based on their responses related to the presence of other people, laypersons were divided into 2 groups: "single-bystander" (absence of others) and "multiple-bystanders" (presence of others). The primary outcome was any rescue action(s) performed by laypersons during an emergency. A total of 1,219 laypersons were eligible for our analysis; 69 (5.7%) encountered emergencies in which others were absent (single-bystander group) and 1,150 (94.3%) encountered emergencies in which others were present (multiple-bystanders group). The proportion of laypersons who performed any rescue actions was 95.7% in the single-bystander group and 73.8% in the multiple-bystanders group. Conclusions: The proportion of laypersons who performed any rescue actions was lower when other people were present compared with when they were absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.