Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497096›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Serum calcium-based interpretable machine learning model for predicting anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multi-center study.

Bo-Yu Kang, Yi-Huan Qiao, Jun Zhu, Bao-Liang Hu, Ze-Cheng Zhang, Ji-Peng Li, Yan-Jiang Pei

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bo-Yu KangDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yi-Huan QiaoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Jun ZhuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Bao-Liang HuYan'an Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi Province, China.
Ze-Cheng ZhangDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Ji-Peng LiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yan-Jiang PeiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710032, Shanxi Province, China. 15829329200@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the promising prospects of utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) for comprehensive disease analysis, few models constructed have been applied in clinical practice due to their complexity and the lack of reasonable explanations. In contrast to previous studies with small sample sizes and limited model interpretability, we developed a transparent eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-based model supported by multi-center data, using patients' basic information and clinical indicators to forecast the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection surgery. The model demonstrated robust predictive performance and identified clinically relevant thresholds, which may assist physicians in optimizing perioperative management.

aimTo develop an interpretable ML model for accurately predicting the occurrence probability of AL after rectal cancer resection and define our clinical alert values for serum calcium ions.

methodsPatients who underwent anterior resection of the rectum for rectal carcinoma at the Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Medical University, and Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, were retrospectively collected from January 2011 to December 2021,. Ten ML models were integrated to analyze the data and develop the predictive models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score were used to evaluate model performance. We employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm to explain the feature importance of the optimal model.

resultsA total of ten features were integrated to construct the predictive model and identify the optimal model. XGBoost was considered the best-performing model with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.984 (95%confidence interval: 0.972-0.996) in the test set (accuracy: 0.925; sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.927). Furthermore, the model achieved an AUC of 0.703 in external validation. The interpretable SHAP algorithm revealed that the serum calcium ion level was the crucial factor influencing the predictions of the model.

conclusionA superior predictive model, leveraging clinical data, has been crafted by employing the most effective XGBoost from a selection of ten algorithms. This model, by predicting the occurrence of AL in patients after rectal cancer resection, has identified the significant role of serum calcium ion levels, providing guidance for clinical practice. The integration of SHAP provides a clear interpretation of the model's predictions.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakCalciumMachine LearningProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRectumRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveCalciumAnastomotic leakageMachine learningRectal cancerSHapley Additive exPlanations algorithms

Identifiers

PMID40497096
PMCPMC12146919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.